Kerksieck Philipp, Brauchli Rebecca, de Bloom Jessica, Shimazu Akihito, Kujanpää Miika, Lanz Madeleine, Bauer Georg F
Public and Organizational Health, Center of Salutogenesis, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Faculty of Social Sciences (Psychology), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:892120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892120. eCollection 2022.
Ongoing developments, such as digitalization, increased the interference of the work and nonwork life domains, urging many to continuously manage engagement in respective domains. The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent home-office regulations further boosted the need for employees to find a good work-nonwork balance, thereby optimizing their health and well-being. Consequently, proactive individual-level crafting strategies for balancing work with other relevant life domains were becoming increasingly important. However, these strategies received insufficient attention in previous research despite their potential relevance for satisfying psychological needs, such as psychological detachment. We addressed this research gap by introducing a new scale measuring crafting for a work-nonwork balance and examining its relevance in job-and life satisfaction, work engagement, subjective vitality, family role and job performance, boundary management and self-rated work-nonwork balance. The Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting Scale was validated in five countries (Austria, Finland, Germany, Japan, and Switzerland), encompassing data from a heterogeneous sample of more than 4,200 employees. In study 1, exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factorial scale structure. Confirmatory factor analysis, test for measurement invariance, and convergent validity were provided in study 2. Replication of confirmatory factor analysis, incremental and criterion validity of the Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting Scale for job and life satisfaction were assessed in study 3. Study 4 displayed criterion validity, test-retest reliability, testing measurement invariance, and applicability of the scale across work cultures. Finally, study 5 delivered evidence for the Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting Scale in predicting work-nonwork balance. The novel Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting Scale captured crafting for the challenging balance between work and nonwork and performed well across several different working cultures in increasingly digitalized societies. Both researchers and practitioners may use this tool to assess crafting efforts to balance both life domains and to study relationships with outcomes relevant to employee health and well-being.
数字化等持续发展的趋势增加了工作领域与非工作生活领域之间的干扰,促使许多人不断管理在各个领域的参与度。新冠疫情及随后的居家办公规定进一步凸显了员工实现良好工作与非工作平衡的必要性,从而优化他们的健康和幸福感。因此,主动在个人层面制定平衡工作与其他相关生活领域的策略变得越来越重要。然而,尽管这些策略对于满足心理需求(如心理脱离)具有潜在相关性,但在以往研究中却未得到充分关注。我们通过引入一个新的衡量工作与非工作平衡的策略制定量表,并考察其在工作满意度、生活满意度、工作投入度、主观活力、家庭角色和工作绩效、边界管理以及自我评定的工作与非工作平衡等方面的相关性,填补了这一研究空白。工作与非工作平衡策略制定量表在五个国家(奥地利、芬兰、德国、日本和瑞士)得到验证,涵盖了来自4200多名员工的异质样本数据。在研究1中,探索性因素分析揭示了一个双因素量表结构。研究2提供了验证性因素分析、测量不变性检验和收敛效度。研究3评估了验证性因素分析的复制情况以及工作与非工作平衡策略制定量表对工作满意度和生活满意度的增量效度和效标效度。研究4展示了效标效度、重测信度、测量不变性检验以及该量表在不同工作文化中的适用性。最后,研究5为工作与非工作平衡策略制定量表在预测工作与非工作平衡方面提供了证据。这个全新的工作与非工作平衡策略制定量表体现了为实现工作与非工作之间具有挑战性的平衡而进行的策略制定,并且在日益数字化的社会中,在几种不同的工作文化中都表现良好。研究人员和从业者都可以使用这个工具来评估为平衡两个生活领域所做的策略制定努力,并研究其与员工健康和幸福感相关结果之间的关系。