Michalke Simon, Lohrenz Lisa, Lattemann Christoph, Robra-Bissantz Susanne
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbh, Management and Economics, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759 Germany.
TU Braunschweig, WI2, Mühlenpfordtstraße 23, Braunschweig, 38106 Germany.
Electron Mark. 2022;32(4):2429-2444. doi: 10.1007/s12525-022-00589-1. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
Engagement platforms (EPs) are an essential technology to enable co-creation and service innovation. Therefore, the design and governance of these platforms are receiving increasing attention in research. In this study, we aim to identify which activities and mechanisms foster engagement and which governance mechanisms are implemented to avoid harm on EPs. To this end, we conducted expert interviews with founders, CEOs, and managers of 14 personal and household-related service platform companies from the DACH region (Germany(D), Austria(A), Switzerland(CH)), to gain insights into their activities and mechanisms for creating and maintaining successful EPs. We found eight mechanisms, e.g., moderation of content, limitations of entry and certification, employed by personal EPs (PEPs) as self-regulatory mechanisms to avoid misconduct and negative experiences of actors. The identified governance mechanisms may guide the design and governing of PEPs by providing tangible examples to foster actor engagement while considering externalities on a societal and individual level.
参与平台(EPs)是实现共同创造和服务创新的一项关键技术。因此,这些平台的设计和治理在研究中受到越来越多的关注。在本研究中,我们旨在确定哪些活动和机制能够促进参与,以及实施哪些治理机制以避免对参与平台造成损害。为此,我们对来自DACH地区(德国(D)、奥地利(A)、瑞士(CH))的14家个人和家庭相关服务平台公司的创始人、首席执行官和经理进行了专家访谈,以深入了解他们创建和维护成功的参与平台的活动和机制。我们发现了八种机制,例如内容审核、准入限制和认证,个人参与平台(PEPs)将其作为自我监管机制,以避免行为不当和参与者的负面体验。所确定的治理机制可以通过提供切实可行的示例来指导个人参与平台的设计和治理,在考虑社会和个人层面外部因素的同时促进参与者的参与。