• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sustaining Continuous Engagement in Value Co-creation Among Individuals in Universities Using Online Platforms: Role of Knowledge Self-Efficacy, Commitment and Perceived Benefits.利用在线平台维持大学个体间价值共创的持续参与:知识自我效能感、承诺和感知利益的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:637808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808. eCollection 2021.
2
Relationships among para-social interaction, perceived benefits, community commitment, and customer citizenship behavior: Evidence from a social live-streaming platform.拟社会互动、感知收益、社区承诺与顾客公民行为的关系:来自社会直播平台的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Oct;250:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104534. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
4
From "Human-to-Human" to "Human-to-Non-human" - Influence Factors of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Consumer Value Co-creation Behavior.从“人到人”到“人到非人”——人工智能赋能的消费者价值共创行为的影响因素
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:863313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313. eCollection 2022.
5
The impact of value co-creation on consumer citizenship behavior: Based on consumer perspective.价值共创对消费者公民行为的影响:基于消费者视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1110011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1110011. eCollection 2022.
6
How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: an empirical analysis.学习者参与如何通过价值共创影响非正规在线学习成果:一项实证分析。
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2022;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00341-x. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Online Customer Experience Leads to Loyalty Customer Engagement: Moderating Role of Value Co-creation.在线客户体验带来忠诚度 客户参与度:价值共创的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:897851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897851. eCollection 2022.
8
Perceived Community Support, Users' Interactions, and Value Co-Creation in Online Health Community: The Moderating Effect of Social Exclusion.在线健康社区中的感知社区支持、用户互动和价值共创:社会排斥的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 27;17(1):204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010204.
9
Consumer Participation in Co-creation: An Enlightening Model of Causes and Effects Based on Ethical Values and Transcendent Motives.消费者参与共创:基于伦理价值观和超越动机的因果启发模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00793. eCollection 2016.
10
Universities without Walls: A Blended Delivery Approach to Training the Next Generation of HIV Researchers in Canada.无墙大学:加拿大培养下一代 HIV 研究人员的混合式交付方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;17(12):4265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124265.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of patient self-efficacy on value co-creation behavior and outcomes in chronic disease management: a cross-sectional study.患者自我效能对慢性病管理中价值共创行为及结果的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22917-8.
2
Determinants Influenced by COVID-19 Vaccine: Employing the Health Action Process Approach and the Belief in Conspiracy Theories.受新冠疫苗影响的决定因素:运用健康行动过程方法及对阴谋论的信念
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 25;11(4):730. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040730.
3
Evaluating the individual, situational, and technological drivers for creative ideas generation in virtual communities: A systematic literature review.评估虚拟社区中产生创意想法的个人、情境和技术驱动因素:一项系统的文献综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:978856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978856. eCollection 2022.
4
What type of client do you need? The brand value co-creation in the banking sector.你需要什么样的客户?银行业中的品牌价值共创。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:988985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988985. eCollection 2022.
5
Influence of co-creation signals on observers' co-creation willingness: A self-determination theory perspective.共创信号对观察者共创意愿的影响:基于自我决定理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:943704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943704. eCollection 2022.
6
Orchestrating Multi-Agent Knowledge Ecosystems: The Role of Makerspaces.编排多智能体知识生态系统:创客空间的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:898134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898134. eCollection 2022.
7
From "Human-to-Human" to "Human-to-Non-human" - Influence Factors of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Consumer Value Co-creation Behavior.从“人到人”到“人到非人”——人工智能赋能的消费者价值共创行为的影响因素
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:863313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313. eCollection 2022.
8
Role of Reputation in Sustainable Performance of Online Crowdsourcing Vendors: An Explanation From Transaction Cost Theory.声誉在在线众包供应商可持续绩效中的作用:基于交易成本理论的解释
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:756134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756134. eCollection 2021.
9
Service Marketing in Online Shopping Platform: Psychological and Behavioral Dimensions.在线购物平台中的服务营销:心理与行为维度
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:759445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759445. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
2
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
3
A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: the effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables.工作相关学习与发展活动参与模式:个体、情境、动机及年龄变量的影响
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):707-24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.707.
4
The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire--turnover cognitions relationships.项目内容重叠对组织承诺问卷——离职认知关系的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Feb;86(1):161-73. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.161.
5
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.内在动机与外在动机:经典定义与新方向
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
6
Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best.管理专业智慧:充分发挥精英优势。
Harv Bus Rev. 1996 Mar-Apr;74(2):71-80.
7
Empathy and altruism.同理心与利他主义。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Dec;32(6):1134-46. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.32.6.1134.

利用在线平台维持大学个体间价值共创的持续参与:知识自我效能感、承诺和感知利益的作用

Sustaining Continuous Engagement in Value Co-creation Among Individuals in Universities Using Online Platforms: Role of Knowledge Self-Efficacy, Commitment and Perceived Benefits.

作者信息

Al-Kumaim Nabil Hasan, Alhazmi Abdulsalam K, Ramayah T, Shabbir Muhammad Salman, Gazem Nadhmi A

机构信息

Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Melaka, Malaysia.

Faculty of Electronic and Distance Learning, University of Science and Technology, Aden, Yemen.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:637808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808
PMID:33643168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7907507/
Abstract

Value Co-Creation (VCC) plays a major role in engaging knowledgeable individuals in a community innovation, problem solving, and new service/product development. This study investigates the personal factors that influence individuals' engagement in value co-creation in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) through the use of online platforms. Some higher education institutions have successfully established or used appropriate online platforms, such as online forums, web applications, and mobile applications to engage their community in ideation or crowdsourcing as a part of the value co-creation process. On the other hand, some HEIs have failed to engage their community in value co-creation activities, and even if they managed to engage some individuals in value co-creation once, they failed to sustain these individuals' engagement in value co-creation using online platforms. Using the Stimulus Organism Response (S-O-R) framework, this study examines the relationship between relevant personal factors (commitment and knowledge self-efficacy) and other motivational factors that provide perceived benefits with value co-creation engagement. Data was collected from 308 respondents at five Malaysian research universities. The software analysis tool Smart PLS is used for data analysis and validation. The results demonstrate that personal factors and perceived benefits as a motivational factor has a significant effect on individual engagement in value co-creation. However, the significance of these findings varies from one individual to another. The implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

价值共创(VCC)在促使知识渊博的个人参与社区创新、解决问题以及新服务/产品开发方面发挥着重要作用。本研究通过在线平台的使用,调查了影响高等教育机构(HEIs)中个人参与价值共创的个人因素。一些高等教育机构已成功建立或使用了合适的在线平台,如在线论坛、网络应用程序和移动应用程序,以使他们的社区参与构思或众包,作为价值共创过程的一部分。另一方面,一些高等教育机构未能使其社区参与价值共创活动,即使他们曾设法让一些个人参与过一次价值共创,他们也未能利用在线平台维持这些个人对价值共创的参与度。本研究使用刺激-机体-反应(S-O-R)框架,考察了相关个人因素(承诺和知识自我效能感)与其他能为价值共创参与提供感知利益的动机因素之间的关系。数据收集自马来西亚五所研究型大学的308名受访者。软件分析工具Smart PLS用于数据分析和验证。结果表明,个人因素和作为动机因素的感知利益对个人参与价值共创有显著影响。然而,这些发现的显著性因个体而异。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。