Liu Li, Yuan Mingjuan, Sun Siqing, Wang Jinrong, Shi Yi, Yu Yamin, Su Xin
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Infectious Disease, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Sep 24;15:5645-5653. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S378249. eCollection 2022.
For acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients with suspected opportunistic infections, the rapid and accurate identification of pathogens remains a challenge. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a pan-pathogen assay for infectious diseases diagnosis, but its guiding significance for diagnosis and antimicrobials treatment in AIDS patients with suspected opportunistic infections is still not well established. In this study, we compared the microbiological diagnostic value of mNGS with that of conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) in AIDS patients with suspected opportunistic infections.
From January 2018 to February 2021, a retrospective study was performed at four tertiary teaching hospitals in China and data of 86 AIDS patients with suspected opportunistic infections were collected. The pathogen detection performance of mNGS and CMTs were compared.
Positive agreement between mNGS and clinical diagnosis was significantly higher than that of CMTs (65/86 (75.6%) vs 37/86 (43.0%)). In addition, mNGS identified more bacterial (25 vs 2), fungal (5 vs 3), viral (9 vs 2) organisms compared with CMTs. Mixed infection were detected in 34 patients by mNGS combined with CMTs. Viruses (94.1%, 32/34) and fungi (94.1%, 32/34) were commonly seen in the mixed infection cases. mNGS helped identify the pathogen or guide appropriate treatment in 49/86 (57%) patients. Meanwhile, CMTs also contributed in the decision of appropriate treatment in 28 patients. The successful de-escalation or discontinuation of treatment was supported in 37 patients with the help of mNGS. We observed a significant reduction in the number of patients being prescribed foscarnet (52.3% vs 23.26%, p < 0.001), moxifloxacin (34.9% vs 10.5%, p = 0.005), and levofloxacin (32.6% vs 14%, p = 0.001) before and after mNGS.
For AIDS patients with suspected opportunistic infections, mNGS can provide early, noninvasive, and rapid microbiological diagnosis. mNGS may lead to a more precise antimicrobial treatment and reduced the unreasonable use of antimicrobials.
对于疑似机会性感染的获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)患者,病原体的快速准确鉴定仍然是一项挑战。宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)已成为一种用于传染病诊断的泛病原体检测方法,但其对疑似机会性感染的艾滋病患者诊断及抗菌药物治疗的指导意义仍未明确。在本研究中,我们比较了mNGS与传统微生物学检测(CMTs)对疑似机会性感染的艾滋病患者的微生物学诊断价值。
2018年1月至2021年2月,在中国四家三级教学医院进行了一项回顾性研究,收集了86例疑似机会性感染的艾滋病患者的数据。比较了mNGS和CMTs的病原体检测性能。
mNGS与临床诊断的阳性一致性显著高于CMTs(65/86(75.6%)对37/86(43.0%))。此外,与CMTs相比,mNGS鉴定出更多的细菌(25种对2种)、真菌(5种对3种)、病毒(9种对2种)病原体。通过mNGS联合CMTs在34例患者中检测到混合感染。混合感染病例中常见病毒(94.1%,32/34)和真菌(94.1%,32/34)。mNGS帮助49/86(57%)的患者鉴定病原体或指导适当治疗。同时,CMTs也为28例患者的适当治疗决策提供了帮助。在mNGS的帮助下,37例患者的治疗成功降级或停药。我们观察到mNGS前后接受膦甲酸钠治疗的患者数量显著减少(52.3%对23.26%,p<0.001),莫西沙星(34.9%对10.5%,p=0.005)和左氧氟沙星(32.6%对14%,p=0.001)。
对于疑似机会性感染的艾滋病患者,mNGS可提供早期、无创且快速的微生物学诊断。mNGS可能导致更精确的抗菌治疗,并减少抗菌药物的不合理使用。