• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合式软性输尿管镜术在肾结石治疗中的应用策略——一篇叙述性综述。

Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sanador Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Urology, Emergency Clinical Hospital Sfântul Ioan, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):919-926. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2022-0110
PMID:36188640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9514813/
Abstract

The introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (suFURSs) in daily practice tends to overcome the main limitations of reusable ureteroscopes (reFURSs), in terms of high acquisition costs, maintenance, breakages and repairing costs, reprocessing and sterilization, as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is promoted as first-line treatment of renal stones in most cases. A hybrid strategy implies having both instruments in the armamentarium of endourology and choosing the best strategy for cost-efficiency and protecting expensive reusable instruments in selected high-risk for breakage cases such as large stones of the inferior calyx, a steep infundibulopelvic angle or narrow infundibulum, or abnormal anatomy as in horseshoe and ectopic kidney. In terms of safety and efficiency, data present suFURSs as a safe alternative considering operating time, stone-free, and complication rates. An important aspect is highlighted by several authors about reusable instrument disinfection as various pathogens are still detected after proper sterilization. This comprehensive narrative review aims to analyze available data comparing suFURSs and reFURSs, considering economic, technical, and operative aspects of the two types of instruments, as well as the strategy of adopting a hybrid approach to selecting the most appropriate flexible ureteroscope in each case.

摘要

一次性使用软性输尿管镜(suFURSs)在日常实践中的引入,旨在克服可重复使用软性输尿管镜(reFURSs)的主要局限性,包括高采购成本、维护、破损和维修成本、再处理和消毒,因为逆行肾内手术(RIRS)在大多数情况下被推广为肾结石的一线治疗方法。混合策略意味着在泌尿外科的武器库中同时拥有这两种器械,并根据成本效益选择最佳策略,在选择高破损风险的情况下(如下盏大结石、陡峭的肾盂漏斗角或狭窄的漏斗部,或马蹄肾和异位肾等异常解剖结构)保护昂贵的可重复使用器械。在安全性和效率方面,数据表明 suFURSs 是一种安全的替代方案,考虑到手术时间、结石清除率和并发症发生率。几位作者强调了一个重要方面,即关于可重复使用器械的消毒,因为即使经过适当的消毒,仍能检测到各种病原体。本综述旨在分析比较 suFURSs 和 reFURSs 的现有数据,考虑两种器械的经济、技术和手术方面,以及采用混合方法选择最适合每种情况的软性输尿管镜的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8986/9514813/2480a92fe0be/JMedLife-15-0919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8986/9514813/4be99a06f64c/JMedLife-15-0919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8986/9514813/2480a92fe0be/JMedLife-15-0919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8986/9514813/4be99a06f64c/JMedLife-15-0919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8986/9514813/2480a92fe0be/JMedLife-15-0919-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.混合式软性输尿管镜术在肾结石治疗中的应用策略——一篇叙述性综述。
J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):919-926. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110.
2
Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.一次性使用软性输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜治疗儿童尿石症的比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Jun;19(3):248.e1-248.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
The Effect of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Aging on the Efficacy and Safety of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.可复用软性输尿管镜老化对逆行性肾内手术疗效和安全性的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Jul;34(7):628-632. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0097. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?逆行肾内手术治疗下极结石的效率:一次性软性输尿管肾镜还是可重复使用软性输尿管肾镜?
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3643-3650. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03656-y. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment.新型超纤细一次性溥生输尿管镜 7.5Fr 在肾结石内镜治疗中的初步经验。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 May-Jun;116(3):354-360. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.3.354.
6
A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.一项前瞻性病例对照研究:比较一次性使用的软性可抛弃输尿管镜LithoVue与软性可重复使用的纤维光学输尿管镜。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):468-475. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0027. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
7
Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of large renal stones.半硬性联合软性输尿管镜治疗大肾结石。
J Med Life. 2023 Sep;16(9):1364-1368. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0236.
8
Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.软性输尿管镜维修的成本分析:基于社区医疗实践的655例手术评估
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):254-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0642. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.一次性使用与可重复使用的数字式软性输尿管镜:前瞻性对比研究。
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):999-1005. doi: 10.1111/iju.14091. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
10
WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.WiScope® 一次性使用数字软性输尿管镜与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Sep;40(9):2323-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04095-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of flexible cystoscopy combined with flexible ureteroscopy on short-term outcomes in patients with complex renal stones.软性膀胱镜联合软性输尿管镜对复杂性肾结石患者短期疗效的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):4515-4525. doi: 10.62347/NZGO3556. eCollection 2024.
2
Unfavorable factors in accessing the pelvicalyceal system during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS).逆行软性输尿管镜检查(fURS)中进入肾盂肾盏系统的不利因素。
J Med Life. 2023 Mar;16(3):372-380. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0005.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-Use vs Reusable Ureteroscopes in Horseshoe Kidney Stones.马蹄肾结石中一次性输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜的比较
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Dec;16(4):568-573. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2021.16.4.568.
2
Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.一次性使用软性输尿管镜与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 13;8:691170. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170. eCollection 2021.
3
Single-use ureteroscopes in ectopic pelvic kidney stones.
一次性输尿管镜用于盆腔异位肾结石
J Med Life. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-564. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0251.
4
Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?在高容量中心,可否通过引入一次性使用软性输尿管镜来延长可重复使用软性输尿管镜的使用寿命?
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):251-256. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03808-0. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Relevance of Adopting a Hybrid Strategy Mixing Single-Use and Reusable Ureteroscopes for Stones Management: An Economic Study to Support the Best Strategy.采用一次性和可重复使用输尿管镜混合策略治疗结石的相关性:一项支持最佳策略的经济学研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 11;10(12):2593. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122593.
6
Heterogeneity of Antibiotics Multidrug-Resistance Profile of Uropathogens in Romanian Population.罗马尼亚人群尿路病原体抗生素多药耐药谱的异质性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 2;10(5):523. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050523.
7
Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.可重复使用、一次性使用还是两者兼用:983 例后软性输尿管镜的成本效率分析。
J Endourol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1454-1459. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0006. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Disposable versus Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Comparison.一次性输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照比较
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Feb 10;13:63-71. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S277049. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients.一次性使用与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的比较:772例患者的汇总分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jan;10(1):483-493. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1009.
10
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: how to choose and what is around the corner?一次性使用软性输尿管镜:如何选择以及未来的发展趋势?
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):87-94. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000852.