Myers Andrew, Ipsen Catherine, Standley Krys
The Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities (RTC:Rural), Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Apr 27;3:877555. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.877555. eCollection 2022.
Lack of transportation is a significant barrier to community participation for many disabled adults. Living in a rural area introduces additional transportation barriers, such as having to travel long distances to access services or socialize, and limited public transit options. While the importance of transportation access is clear, the mix of different transportation options used by people with disabilities to participate in their communities is less understood, particularly among those who do not or cannot drive.
We used data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey to explore transportation behaviors among disabled adults in rural and urban areas and by four regions across the United States. We explored differences by transportation modalities (e.g., driver, passenger, public transportation, taxi/uber, walk) and trip purposes (e.g., social, independent living, healthcare, work). Our sample included 22,716 adults with travel-limiting disabilities.
Several geographic differences emerged among non-drivers. Rural non-drivers were less likely to take any trip, particularly for social activities, and reported using less public transportation or walking/rolling than urban non-drivers. Further, respondents from the Northeast were more likely to report using public transportation and walking/rolling options, relative to the Midwest, South, and West. Overall, disabled rural adults reported lower odds of giving up driving, even after controlling for socio-demographic and health characteristics.
These findings highlight the relative importance of different transportation modalities for participating in activities and the continued reliance upon personal vehicles, either as a driver or passenger, especially among rural disabled residents. Potential policy insights are discussed.
缺乏交通出行条件是许多残疾成年人参与社区活动的重大障碍。生活在农村地区会带来额外的交通障碍,比如必须长途跋涉才能获得服务或进行社交活动,而且公共交通选择有限。虽然交通出行的重要性显而易见,但残疾人用于参与社区活动的不同交通方式的组合却鲜为人知,尤其是在那些不会开车或不能开车的人群中。
我们使用了2017年全国家庭出行调查的数据,来探究美国农村和城市地区以及四个区域的残疾成年人的交通行为。我们按交通方式(如驾车者、乘客、公共交通、出租车/优步、步行)和出行目的(如社交、独立生活、医疗保健、工作)来探究差异。我们的样本包括22716名有出行限制残疾的成年人。
在非驾车者中出现了一些地理差异。农村非驾车者出行的可能性较小,尤其是参与社交活动时,而且与城市非驾车者相比,他们使用公共交通或步行/滚动出行的频率较低。此外,相对于中西部、南部和西部,东北部的受访者更有可能报告使用公共交通和步行/滚动出行方式。总体而言,即使在控制了社会人口统计学和健康特征之后,农村残疾成年人报告放弃开车的几率较低。
这些发现凸显了不同交通方式对于参与活动的相对重要性,以及对个人车辆(无论是作为驾驶者还是乘客)的持续依赖,尤其是在农村残疾居民中。文中还讨论了潜在的政策见解。