• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

充分利用病例讨论会。

Making the most of a Morbidity and Mortality meeting.

机构信息

University Sussex Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(2):145-154. doi: 10.3233/JRS-210077.

DOI:10.3233/JRS-210077
PMID:36189607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and Mortality meetings (M&Ms) are a fundamental element of surgical practice. However, there has been little investigation into best practices, to maximise education and improvement outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Create a new, evidence-based M&M methodology, that facilitates standardised analysis of errors in a non-judgemental fashion, and highlights areas for improvement.

METHODS

A Quality Improvement (QI) methodology was used. This project encompassed a literature review and two sequential QI cycles. A literature review and initial survey highlighted best practice and identified areas for improvement. From this information, a new standardised format was created, which centred around a new modified Fishbone framework, incorporating the London Protocol methodology. The project then sequentially tested new formats, with feedback collected for every new format.

RESULTS

The literature review and surveys guided improvement of the M&M. The need for standardisation was highlighted. The new PowerPoint template and modified Fishbone ensured presentations and analysis were consistent and systematic. Participants reported that M&Ms were more engaging, interactive and structured, ensuring improved discussion of errors. The modified Fishbone framework reinforced a blame-free, system-focused analysis.

CONCLUSION

M&Ms are a critical aspect of patient safety. This project utilised simple QI tools to encourage collaborative reflection, learning and improvement.

摘要

背景

发病率和死亡率会议(M&Ms)是外科实践的基本要素。然而,对于如何最大限度地提高教育和改善效果的最佳实践,研究甚少。

目的

创建一种新的基于证据的 M&M 方法,以非评判的方式促进对错误的标准化分析,并突出改进的领域。

方法

使用了质量改进(QI)方法。该项目包括文献回顾和两个连续的 QI 循环。文献回顾和初步调查突出了最佳实践,并确定了改进的领域。根据这些信息,创建了一个新的标准化格式,该格式以新的改良鱼骨框架为中心,纳入了伦敦议定书方法。该项目随后连续测试了新的格式,并为每个新格式收集反馈。

结果

文献回顾和调查指导了 M&M 的改进。需要标准化。新的 PowerPoint 模板和改良的鱼骨框架确保了演示和分析的一致性和系统性。参与者报告说,M&Ms 更具吸引力、互动性和结构性,确保了对错误的更深入讨论。改良的鱼骨框架强化了无责、以系统为中心的分析。

结论

M&Ms 是患者安全的关键方面。该项目利用简单的 QI 工具鼓励协作反思、学习和改进。

相似文献

1
Making the most of a Morbidity and Mortality meeting.充分利用病例讨论会。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(2):145-154. doi: 10.3233/JRS-210077.
2
Toward Best Practices for Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Mixed Methods Study.迈向手术发病率和死亡率会议的最佳实践:一项混合方法研究。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
3
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.针对学生的质量改进与患者安全工作坊的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3.
4
Chief of Residents for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Recipe for a New Role in Graduate Medical Education.质量改进与患者安全住院总医师:研究生医学教育新角色的秘诀
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1747-e1751. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00179.
5
Transforming surgical morbidity and mortality into a systematic case review.将手术发病率和死亡率转化为系统的病例回顾。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Jan;56(1):80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
National Multispecialty Survey Results: Comparing Morbidity and Mortality Conference Practices within and outside Otolaryngology.全国多专科调查结果:比较耳鼻喉科内外的发病率和死亡率会议实践。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb;158(2):273-279. doi: 10.1177/0194599817737993. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
7
Effects of efforts to optimise morbidity and mortality rounds to serve contemporary quality improvement and educational goals: a systematic review.优化发病率和死亡率查房以服务当代质量改进和教育目标的效果:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jan;27(1):74-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006632. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
8
Systematic Review of Morbidity and Mortality Meeting Standardization: Does It Lead to Improved Professional Development, System Improvements, Clinician Engagement, and Enhanced Patient Safety Culture?发病率和死亡率会议标准化的系统评价:它是否能带来专业发展的改善、系统改进、临床医生参与度的提高以及患者安全文化的强化?
J Patient Saf. 2024 Mar 1;20(2):125-130. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001184. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Neurology Morbidity and Mortality Conferences and Quality Improvement: Single-Center Experience and National Survey.神经病学发病率与死亡率会议及质量改进:单中心经验与全国性调查
Neurohospitalist. 2022 Apr;12(2):231-240. doi: 10.1177/19418744211067043. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
10
Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Narrative Review of Strategies to Prioritize Quality Improvement.发病率与死亡率研讨会:关于优先开展质量改进策略的叙述性综述
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Nov;42(11):516-527. doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42094-5. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the numbers: Classifying contributory factors and potentially avoidable adverse events in the gynaecology service of National Women's Health at Auckland District Health Board.数字之外:奥克兰地区卫生局国家妇女健康部妇科服务中促成因素及潜在可避免不良事件的分类
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):619-625. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13844. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Human factors in anaesthetic practice. Part 2: clinical implications.麻醉实践中的人为因素。第2部分:临床意义。
BJA Educ. 2024 Feb;24(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Dec 21.