• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次收肌管阻滞在初次全膝关节置换术前后的疗效 - 时机有影响吗?一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block before Versus after primary total knee arthroplasty - Does timing make a difference? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 36632Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 Sep-Dec;30(3):10225536221132050. doi: 10.1177/10225536221132050.

DOI:10.1177/10225536221132050
PMID:36189733
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe postoperative pain. Multimodal analgesia, including peripheral nerve block, is recommended for post-operative pain relief. Administration of some pain medications prior to surgery has shown to be more effective than after the operation. This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the adductor canal block (ACB) performed immediately before or immediately after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that ACB before the surgery will reduce postoperative pain and improve knee function.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups, with 26 patients receiving a preoperative ACB and 24 receiving a postoperative ACB.

RESULTS

Treatment groups were similar in terms of gender ( = .83), age ( = 0.61) weight ( = .39) and ASA score. Average visual analogue scale (VAS) on arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were 4.9 ± 3.2 in the preoperative ACB versus 3.4 ± 2.8 for the postoperative ACB ( = .075). VAS scores at different time points as well as the mean, minimal and maximal reported VAS scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The cumulative quantities of Fentanyl administered by the anesthesia team was comparable between the groups. Similarly, the dosage of Morphine, Tramadol, Acetaminophen and Dipyrone showed only small variations. The Quality of Recovery Score, Knee Society Scores and knee range of motion did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate no significant differences in patient total narcotics consumption, pain scores and functional scores, between preoperative and postoperative ACB in patients undergoing TKA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov and was assigned the registration number NCT02908711.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level I randomized controlled trial.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后疼痛剧烈。多模式镇痛,包括外周神经阻滞,推荐用于术后止痛。手术前给予一些止痛药比手术后更有效。这是一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,旨在比较在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)前或后即刻行收肌管阻滞(ACB)的镇痛效果。我们假设手术前行 ACB 会减轻术后疼痛并改善膝关节功能。

方法

共纳入 50 例患者,随机分为 2 组,26 例患者接受术前 ACB,24 例患者接受术后 ACB。

结果

治疗组在性别(=0.83)、年龄(=0.61)、体重(=0.39)和 ASA 评分方面相似。到达麻醉后护理病房(PACU)时,术前 ACB 组平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)为 4.9±3.2,术后 ACB 组为 3.4±2.8(=0.075)。两组在不同时间点的 VAS 评分以及报告的平均、最小和最大 VAS 评分均无显著差异。麻醉团队给予的芬太尼累积量在两组之间相似。同样,吗啡、曲马多、对乙酰氨基酚和赖氨匹林的剂量也只有很小的变化。两组间的恢复质量评分、膝关节协会评分和膝关节活动度无差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在接受 TKA 的患者中,与术后 ACB 相比,术前 ACB 对患者总阿片类药物消耗、疼痛评分和功能评分没有显著影响。

试验注册

该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,并被分配了注册号 NCT02908711。

证据水平

一级随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block before Versus after primary total knee arthroplasty - Does timing make a difference? A randomized controlled trial.单次收肌管阻滞在初次全膝关节置换术前后的疗效 - 时机有影响吗?一项随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 Sep-Dec;30(3):10225536221132050. doi: 10.1177/10225536221132050.
2
Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.收肌管阻滞联合吗啡和倍他米松局部浸润镇痛对全膝关节置换术的镇痛效果优于单纯局部浸润镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05388-5.
3
Adductor canal block with or without added magnesium sulfate following total knee arthroplasty: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞联合或不联合硫酸镁:一项多组随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;68(7):1028-1037. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01985-5. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Efficacy of Two Unique Combinations of Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.两种独特的神经阻滞联合方案对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3421-3431. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.连续收肌管阻滞优于单独收肌管阻滞或收肌管阻滞联合 IPACK 阻滞(腘动脉和膝关节后囊之间的间隙)在全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和活动:随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00682-8. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
6
Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined With Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.单次收肌管阻滞联合后囊浸润对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1650-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.076. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
7
Adductor canal block combined with genicular nerve block versus local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized noninferiority trial.收肌管阻滞联合膝神经关节支阻滞与局部浸润镇痛用于全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05048-5.
8
iPACK block (local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) added to the adductor canal blocks versus the adductor canal blocks in the pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.iPACK 阻滞(即隐动脉和后膝关节囊之间的间隙局部麻醉浸润)联合收肌管阻滞与单纯收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 12;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03272-5.
9
Comparative study of the influence of adductor canal block plus multimodal periarticular infiltration versus combined adductor canal block, multimodal periarticular infiltration and intra-articular epidural catheter ropivacaine infiltration on pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.股神经阻滞联合多模式关节周围浸润与股神经阻滞联合多模式关节周围浸润和关节内罗哌卡因硬膜外导管浸润对全膝关节置换术后镇痛效果的比较研究:一项前瞻性研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Aug;104(2):201-206. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00613-2. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Analgesic efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block versus adductor canal block combined with intra-articular ropivacaine infusion after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后单次股内收肌管阻滞与股内收肌管阻滞联合关节腔内注射罗哌卡因的镇痛效果比较
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Dec;2(12):1082-1088. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0119.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review of the literature.全膝关节置换术中的收肌管阻滞:文献综述
BJA Open. 2025 Mar 18;14:100381. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100381. eCollection 2025 Jun.