• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建后翻修或再断裂的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Second Clinical School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;51(11):3053-3075. doi: 10.1177/03635465221119787. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1177/03635465221119787
PMID:36189967
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后再次断裂或需要翻修是一种严重的并发症。针对风险因素的早期识别的预防策略对于降低再次手术的发生率非常重要。

目的

进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查 ACLR 后翻修或再断裂的风险因素。

研究设计

系统评价和荟萃分析;证据水平,4 级。

方法

从数据库建立到 2021 年 11 月在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行文献检索,并于 2022 年 1 月进行更新。纳入了定量、原始研究报告潜在调整风险因素的研究。计算潜在风险因素的比值比(OR)。

结果

共有来自 13 个国家的 71 项研究符合纳入标准,总样本量为 629120 人。15 个因素与 ACLR 后翻修或再断裂的风险增加相关:男性(OR,1.27;95%CI,1.14-1.41)、年龄较小(OR,1.07;95%CI,1.05-1.08)、较低的身体质量指数(BMI)(OR,1.03;95%CI,1.00-1.06)、家族史(OR,2.47;95%CI,1.50-4.08)、白种人(OR,1.32;95%CI,1.08-1.60)、较高的后外侧胫骨倾斜角(OR,1.15;95%CI,1.05-1.26)、术前高度的前膝松弛度(OR,2.30;95%CI,1.46-3.64)、较高的基线 Marx 活动水平(OR,1.07;95%CI,1.02-1.13)、恢复到高度活动水平/运动(OR,2.03;95%CI,1.15-3.57)、ACL 重建距受伤不到 1 年(OR,2.05;95%CI,1.81-2.32)、同时合并内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤(OR,1.62;95%CI,1.31-2.00)、前内侧入路或经皮入路技术(OR,1.36;95%CI,1.22-1.51)、腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植物(vs 骨-髌腱-骨[BPTB]自体移植物)(OR,1.60;95%CI,1.40-1.82)、同种异体移植物(OR,2.63;95%CI,1.65-4.19)和较小的移植物直径(OR,1.21;95%CI,1.05-1.38)。其他因素与 ACLR 后翻修或再断裂的风险增加无关联。

结论

男性、年龄较小、较低的 BMI、家族史、白种人、较高的后外侧胫骨倾斜角、术前高度的前膝松弛度、较高的基线 Marx 活动水平、恢复到高度活动水平/运动、ACL 重建距受伤不到 1 年、同时合并 MCL 损伤、前内侧入路或经皮入路技术、HT 自体移植物(vs BPTB 自体移植物)、同种异体移植物和较小的移植物直径可能会增加 ACLR 后翻修或再断裂的风险。提高对风险因素的认识并实施有效的预防/干预措施是临床医生的首要任务,以降低 ACLR 后翻修或再断裂的发生率。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建后翻修或再断裂的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;51(11):3053-3075. doi: 10.1177/03635465221119787. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.《使用改良 Lemaire 技术结合骨-髌腱-骨移植物与腘绳肌肌腱结合前外侧韧带重建对前交叉韧带重建的翻修:来自 SANTI 研究组的一项平均随访 5 年的临床对比配对研究》
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):395-403. doi: 10.1177/03635465211061123. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry.凯撒医疗前交叉韧带重建登记处中与翻修手术和对侧前交叉韧带重建相关的危险因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):641-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514561745. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
4
Age-Related Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 21,304 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry.前交叉韧带重建翻修术的年龄相关危险因素:一项来自凯撒医疗机构前交叉韧带注册中心21304例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):331-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546515614813. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建术后手术部位感染的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;57(2):118-128. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105448. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts Compared With Autografts.与自体移植相比,使用骨-髌腱-骨同种异体移植进行前交叉韧带重建后翻修风险增加。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1333-1340. doi: 10.1177/0363546517690386. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?高中和大学年龄段运动员的前交叉韧带重建:移植物选择是否会影响前交叉韧带翻修率?
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):298-309. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892991. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.移植物直径作为翻修前交叉韧带重建以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)值的预测指标:一项基于瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处2240例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704177. Epub 2017 May 1.
9
Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Soft Tissue Allografts Compared With Autografts: Graft Processing and Time Make a Difference.与自体移植物相比,使用软组织异体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建后翻修风险增加:移植物处理和时间有影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1837-1844. doi: 10.1177/0363546517694354. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.各种类型肌腱移植物重建前交叉韧带后膝关节结局的网状 Meta 分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 Feb;44(2):365-380. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04417-8. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Risk Profile Calculator for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery using a Novel Scoring System: The Multi-factorial ACL Target Score (MATS) Score.一种使用新型评分系统的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术风险评估计算器:多因素ACL目标评分(MATS)评分。
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Jul;19(2):66-72. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2507.009.
2
Core exercises for performance, pain, and Lower-limb biomechanics in individuals with ACL-Reconstruction: A systematic review with Meta-analysis of randomized control trials.前交叉韧带重建患者的运动表现、疼痛及下肢生物力学的核心训练:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13568-1.
3
Efficacy of Fibrin Clot Implantation for Reduction of Bone Tunnel Enlargement in Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction Using Autogenous Hamstring Graft.
纤维蛋白凝块植入术在自体腘绳肌腱移植双束前交叉韧带重建中减少骨隧道扩大的疗效
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 16;13(7):23259671251349750. doi: 10.1177/23259671251349750. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Greater psychological response and participation in knee-strenuous activity 8 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalised joint hypermobility who sustained a second anterior cruciate ligament injury: A cross-sectional registry study.患有全身关节过度活动综合征且第二次前交叉韧带损伤的患者,在前交叉韧带重建术后8个月时,心理反应更强烈,参与膝关节剧烈活动的程度更高:一项横断面登记研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 13;12(3):e70351. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70351. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Side-hop test can detect deficits in knee functional ability in male athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to a control group during a battery test performance.与对照组相比,在一系列测试表现中,侧跳测试能够检测出男性运动员前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节功能能力的缺陷。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jun 25;7:1545226. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1545226. eCollection 2025.
6
The Durability of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Patients at <5 Years and ≥5 Years After Revision.翻修前交叉韧带重建的耐久性:5年以下和翻修后≥5年患者的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 24;13(6):23259671251339170. doi: 10.1177/23259671251339170. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Higher revision and secondary surgery rates after ACL reconstruction in athletes under 16 compared to those over 16: a case-control study.16岁以下运动员与16岁以上运动员相比,前交叉韧带重建术后的翻修率和二次手术率更高:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 17;20(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05935-5.
8
Chinese expert consensus on failure and revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后失败与翻修的中国专家共识
J Orthop Translat. 2025 May 23;52:451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and additional surgeries: A review.前交叉韧带重建翻修术及其他手术:综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 23;104(21):e42620. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042620.
10
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the Press-Fit-Hybrid technique-A cohort study with an up to 10-year follow-up.采用压配式混合技术重建前交叉韧带——一项长达10年随访的队列研究
J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 6;12(2):e70257. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70257. eCollection 2025 Apr.