• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度人 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度测试的规范数据库。

Normative database for Spaeth Richman contrast sensitivity test for Indian eyes.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;70(10):3476-3482. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_491_22.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_491_22
PMID:36190030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9789830/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To ascertain normative database of contrast sensitivity (CS) using Spaeth/Richman CS test (SPARCS) in the Indian population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 200 healthy individuals, and CS was tested in both eyes of each participant using SPARCS. A detailed ocular examination was done before enrollment to rule out pathologies that may affect CS. A practice test was performed in the right eye (OD), followed by uniocular testing in each eye and a final binocular test.

RESULTS

Data of 400 eyes of 200 subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria was evaluated. The average age of subjects was 46.57 ± 16.77 years (range 21-79 years), with a slight female preponderance (53%, n = 106). A statistically significant decline in average SPARCS scores was noted with increasing age (P < 0.05), ranging from 86.68 (20-29 years age group) to 67.44 (70-79 years age group). Higher scores were noted in binocular testing than uniocular testing (Interclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.83; P < 0.001). Females achieved statistically significant higher total scores in uniocular SPARCS testing (both OD and OS), but there was no significant difference noted between the two genders in binocular testing. Correlation between practice and main tests was statistically Significant with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.54 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Normative database for SPARCS was established for Indian eyes, with a decreasing trend noted in peripheral as well as central CS scores with increasing age.

摘要

目的

使用 Spaeth/Richman 对比敏感度(CS)测试(SPARCS)确定印度人群的 CS 正常参考值数据库。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了 200 名健康个体,使用 SPARCS 测试每位参与者的双眼 CS。在入组前进行详细的眼部检查,以排除可能影响 CS 的病变。先在右眼(OD)进行练习测试,然后分别对每只眼进行单眼测试,最后进行双眼测试。

结果

评估了符合纳入标准的 200 名受试者的 400 只眼的数据。受试者的平均年龄为 46.57 ± 16.77 岁(范围 21-79 岁),女性略占优势(53%,n = 106)。随着年龄的增长,SPARCS 平均得分呈显著下降趋势(P < 0.05),范围从 86.68(20-29 岁年龄组)到 67.44(70-79 岁年龄组)。双眼测试的得分高于单眼测试(组内相关系数 [ICC] = 0.83;P < 0.001)。女性在单眼 SPARCS 测试(OD 和 OS)中获得的总得分显著更高,但在双眼测试中,两性之间没有显著差异。练习测试和主要测试之间的相关性具有统计学意义,组内相关系数为 0.54(P < 0.001)。

结论

为印度人眼建立了 SPARCS 的正常参考值数据库,随着年龄的增长,外周和中央 CS 得分呈下降趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ff/9789830/cb0b4c9e16b1/IJO-70-3476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ff/9789830/c3690efdf6b1/IJO-70-3476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ff/9789830/cb0b4c9e16b1/IJO-70-3476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ff/9789830/c3690efdf6b1/IJO-70-3476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ff/9789830/cb0b4c9e16b1/IJO-70-3476-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Normative database for Spaeth Richman contrast sensitivity test for Indian eyes.印度人 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度测试的规范数据库。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;70(10):3476-3482. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_491_22.
2
Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.建立Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度测试的标准数据库并评估其重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;63(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0640-3. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
3
The SPARCS: a novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error.SPARCS:矫正屈光不正患者对比敏感度的一种新型评估方法及其可靠性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;100(10):1421-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307378. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.使用一种新型的基于计算机的测试——斯派思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试,评估年龄相关性黄斑变性中的对比敏感度。
Retina. 2015 Jul;35(7):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474.
5
SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.正常对照者和白内障患者的SPARCS及佩利-罗布森对比敏感度测试
Eye (Lond). 2017 May;31(5):753-761. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.319. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.斯帕思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试(SPARCS):设计、可重复性及识别青光眼患者的能力
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;99(1):16-20. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305223. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Contrast sensitivity in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.特发性颅内高压的对比敏感度。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct-Dec;64(4):380-386. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2020.59.
8
Change in contrast sensitivity and OCT parameters in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.特发性颅内高压患者对比敏感度和光学相干断层扫描参数的变化
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 19;14:25158414221083358. doi: 10.1177/25158414221083358. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.应用 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度试验和 Pelli Robson 图表试验评估不同严重程度青光眼患者的对比敏感度。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0099-y. Epub 2018 May 14.
10
Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in thyroid eye disease.甲状腺眼病的中心和周边对比敏感度。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;72(10):1466-1470. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2593_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.建立Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度测试的标准数据库并评估其重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;63(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0640-3. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
2
Genetic influence on contrast sensitivity in young adults.遗传对年轻人对比敏感度的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;97(4):e663-e664. doi: 10.1111/aos.13955. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.
双眼对比度总和与抑制取决于空间频率、偏心率和双眼视差。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Sep;38(5):525-537. doi: 10.1111/opo.12581. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
4
The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.斯帕思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试(SPARCS):设计、可重复性及识别青光眼患者的能力
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;99(1):16-20. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305223. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?个体对比敏感度差异的主要原因是什么?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069536. Print 2013.
6
Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests.对比敏感度基础及对现有测试方法的评价。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;39(7):1100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 23.
7
Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution.性与视觉 I:时空分辨率。
Biol Sex Differ. 2012 Sep 4;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-3-20.
8
Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Australian male adults: Florey Adult Male Ageing Study.澳大利亚成年男性对比敏感度的年龄相关性变化:弗洛里成人男性衰老研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;91(4):312-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02379.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
Age-related decline of contrast sensitivity for second-order stimuli: earlier onset, but slower progression, than for first-order stimuli.与年龄相关的二阶刺激对比度敏感度下降:比一阶刺激更早出现,但进展更慢。
J Vis. 2009 Jul 31;9(7):18. doi: 10.1167/9.7.18.
10
Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.两种新型对比敏感度图表的临床评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;91(6):749-52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.109280. Epub 2006 Dec 13.