• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一种新型的基于计算机的测试——斯派思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试,评估年龄相关性黄斑变性中的对比敏感度。

EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.

作者信息

Faria Bruno M, Duman Fulya, Zheng Cindy X, Waisbourd Michael, Gupta Lalita, Ali Mohsin, Zangalli Camila, Lu Lan, Wizov Sheryl S, Spaeth Eric, Richman Jesse, Spaeth George L

机构信息

Wills Eye Hospital Glaucoma Research Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Retina. 2015 Jul;35(7):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474
PMID:25658175
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a valuable measure of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The authors aimed to compare a novel computer-based test (the Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test) with Pelli-Robson test for evaluating CS in patients with AMD.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, CS was evaluated in patients with various stages of AMD and healthy controls using Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test and Pelli-Robson test. Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test determined CS scores for 5 areas of vision for each eye (central, superonasal, superotemporal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal) and the total score. Test scores between the two methods were compared using mixed-effects linear regression. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations. Test-retest reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Of 35 participants with AMD (54 eyes) and 34 controls (66 eyes), 51% were female and 93% were of European descent. The mean Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test score for the central area and each of the 4 peripheral quadrants was significantly lower for patients with AMD versus controls (P < 0.001 for all). The mean Pelli-Robson score was also significantly lower in patients with AMD versus controls (P < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test total score and Pelli-Robson score was 0.87 and 0.92, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test, a novel Internet-based method of testing CS, had significantly lower scores for patients with AMD compared with controls for central and peripheral vision. This test is a valuable tool for assessing CS in AMD.

摘要

背景

对比敏感度(CS)是评估年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者视觉功能的一项重要指标。作者旨在比较一种新型的基于计算机的测试(斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试)与佩利-罗布森测试在评估AMD患者CS方面的效果。

方法

在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,使用斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试和佩利-罗布森测试对不同阶段的AMD患者和健康对照者的CS进行评估。斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试确定了每只眼睛5个视觉区域(中央、鼻上、颞上、鼻下和颞下)的CS分数以及总分。使用混合效应线性回归比较两种方法的测试分数。采用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数来确定相关性。使用组内相关系数确定重测信度。

结果

35例AMD患者(共54只眼)和34例对照者(共66只眼)中,51%为女性,93%为欧洲血统。AMD患者中央区域以及4个周边象限的斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试平均分数均显著低于对照者(所有P值均<0.001)。AMD患者的佩利-罗布森平均分数也显著低于对照者(P<0.001)。斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试总分和佩利-罗布森分数的组内相关系数分别为0.87和0.92。

结论

斯佩思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试是一种新型的基于互联网的CS测试方法,与对照者相比,AMD患者中央和周边视力的测试分数显著更低。该测试是评估AMD患者CS的一项重要工具。

相似文献

1
EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.使用一种新型的基于计算机的测试——斯派思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试,评估年龄相关性黄斑变性中的对比敏感度。
Retina. 2015 Jul;35(7):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474.
2
Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.应用 Spaeth Richman 对比敏感度试验和 Pelli Robson 图表试验评估不同严重程度青光眼患者的对比敏感度。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0099-y. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.建立Spaeth/Richman对比敏感度测试的标准数据库并评估其重测重复性。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;63(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0640-3. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
4
The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.斯帕思/里奇曼对比敏感度测试(SPARCS):设计、可重复性及识别青光眼患者的能力
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;99(1):16-20. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305223. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.字母对比敏感度测试:一种新设计的临床评估
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2739-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1419.
6
SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.正常对照者和白内障患者的SPARCS及佩利-罗布森对比敏感度测试
Eye (Lond). 2017 May;31(5):753-761. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.319. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
7
Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration.明视 Pelli-Robson 对比敏感度和 MP-1 微视野计在健康衰老和年龄相关性黄斑变性中的应用。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;94(8):e772-e778. doi: 10.1111/aos.13112. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Relationships Between Measures of the Ability to Perform Vision-Related Activities, Vision-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Findings in Patients With Glaucoma.青光眼患者视功能相关活动能力、视功能相关生活质量测量指标与临床检查结果的关系。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;133(12):1377-85. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3426.
9
Intersession repeatability of contrast sensitivity scores in age-related macular degeneration.年龄相关性黄斑变性患者对比敏感度评分的学期间重复性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;50(6):2621-5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2407. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
10
The SPARCS: a novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error.SPARCS:矫正屈光不正患者对比敏感度的一种新型评估方法及其可靠性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;100(10):1421-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307378. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.使用 K-CS 测试评估视障人士的对比敏感度。一种新颖的基于智能手机的对比敏感度测试——设计与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0288512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288512. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparing Ocular Toxicity of Legacy and Alternative Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Zebrafish Larvae.比较传统全氟和多氟烷基物质与替代物质对斑马鱼幼体的眼毒性。
Toxics. 2023 Dec 14;11(12):1021. doi: 10.3390/toxics11121021.
3
Test-retest repeatability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test: towards the validation of a new clinical endpoint.
定量对比敏感度功能测试的重测重复性和一致性:新临床终点的验证。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;262(3):813-822. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06291-y. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Effect of different screen brightness and devices on online visual acuity test.不同屏幕亮度和设备对在线视力测试的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb;262(2):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06206-x. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.黄斑病变患者的双眼视觉功能和固视控制:综述。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Mar;42(2):258-271. doi: 10.1111/opo.12925. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
6
Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.俄亥俄对比卡片的重测重复性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 1;98(9):1070-1077. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001771.
7
Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function in Non-Neovascular and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function Test.测量非新生血管性和新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的对比敏感度函数:定量对比敏感度函数测试
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 24;10(13):2768. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132768.
8
Correlation of macular sensitivity measures and visual acuity to vision-related quality of life in patients with age-related macular degeneration.年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的黄斑敏感性测量值与视力相关生活质量的相关性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01901-x.
9
Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using a Novel Stimulus.新型刺激在视网膜静脉阻塞中的对比敏感度测试。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.29. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.检测中老年相关性黄斑变性的视力丧失:视觉功能测试的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231748. eCollection 2020.