Suppr超能文献

基于自主的辅助自杀方法:一种避免对辅助死亡法律的表现主义反对的方法。

An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide: a way to avoid the expressivist objection against assisted dying laws.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2023 Jul;49(7):497-501. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108375. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

In several jurisdictions, irremediable suffering from a medical condition is a legal requirement for access to assisted dying. According to the expressivist objection, allowing assisted dying for a specific group of persons, such as those with irremediable medical conditions, expresses the judgment that their lives are not worth living. While the expressivist objection has often been used to argue that assisted dying should not be legalised, I show that there is an alternative solution available to its proponents. An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide regards the provision of assisted suicide (but not euthanasia) as justified when it is autonomously requested by a person, irrespective of whether this is in her best interests. Such an approach has been put forward by a recent judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court, which understands assisted suicide as an expression of the person's right to a self-determined death. It does not allow for beneficence-based restrictions regarding the person's suffering or medical diagnosis and therefore avoids the expressivist objection. I argue that on an autonomy-based approach, assisted suicide should not be understood as a medical procedure but rather as the person's autonomous action.

摘要

在一些司法管辖区,不可逆转的医疗状况是获得协助自杀的法律要求。根据表现主义反对意见,允许特定群体的人(如患有不可逆转的医疗状况的人)协助自杀,表达了他们的生命不值得活下去的判断。虽然表现主义反对意见经常被用来论证协助自杀不应合法化,但我表明,其支持者可以采取另一种解决方案。基于自主权的协助自杀方法认为,只要一个人自主请求提供协助自杀(而不是安乐死),就可以认为其是合理的,而不论这是否符合她的最佳利益。德国联邦宪法法院最近的一项判决就提出了这种方法,该判决将协助自杀理解为个人自主决定死亡的权利的表现。它不允许基于仁慈的限制,即关于个人的痛苦或医疗诊断,因此避免了表现主义反对意见。我认为,在基于自主权的方法中,协助自杀不应被理解为医疗程序,而应被视为个人的自主行为。

相似文献

1
An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide: a way to avoid the expressivist objection against assisted dying laws.
J Med Ethics. 2023 Jul;49(7):497-501. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108375. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Reasons for providing assisted suicide and the expressivist objection: a response to Donaldson.
J Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 20;50(10):721-722. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109697.
4
Suicide booths and assistance without moral expression: a response to Braun.
J Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 20;50(10):718-720. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109623.
5
[The right to die and assisted suicide: Review and critical analysis].
Encephale. 2022 Apr;48(2):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
[Conscientious objection to assisted suicide. Switching the rule.].
Recenti Prog Med. 2022 Nov;113(11):649-653. doi: 10.1701/3907.38892.
8
Autonomy-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: a critique.
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 May;16(2):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9365-5.
9
The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?
J Med Ethics. 2022 Aug;48(8):542-546. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107233. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
[Suicide prevention in the context of assisted suicide].
Nervenarzt. 2022 Nov;93(11):1112-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01382-3. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Expressivist concerns for assisted dying on request.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1136/jme-2025-110759.
3
Life, death, and ethics: medical and dental students' attitudes on assisted dying in Austria.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12608-w.
4
Tipping Point: Pathogenic Stress and the Biopolitics of Euthanasia.
Linacre Q. 2024 Oct 18:00243639241287918. doi: 10.1177/00243639241287918.

本文引用的文献

1
Should Assessments of Decision-Making Capacity Be Risk-Sensitive? A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:897144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897144. eCollection 2022.
2
Disability-based arguments against assisted dying laws.
Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):680-686. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13036. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Risk-related standards of competence are a nonsense.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Nov;48(11):893-898. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-108107. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Restricting Access, Stigmatizing Disability?
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Feb;22(2):25-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2013989.
6
The Unstable Boundary of Suffering-Based Euthanasia Regimes.
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Feb;22(2):59-62. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2015964.
8
Lives Not Worth Living in Modern Euthanasia Regimes.
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jun;16(2):134-136. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12300. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Expressivism at the beginning and end of life.
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):545-546. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106372. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Expressivism at the beginning and end of life.
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):538-544. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105875. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验