• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Allostatic load predicts racial disparities in intracerebral hemorrhage cognitive outcomes.累积性应激负荷预测颅内出血认知结局的种族差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;12(1):16556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20987-x.
2
Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage.非创伤性颅内出血后缺血性卒中风险的种族和民族差异。
Stroke. 2023 Sep;54(9):2401-2408. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043160. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Untreated Hypertension: A Powerful Risk Factor for Lobar and Nonlobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.未经治疗的高血压:白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔人群发生脑叶及非脑叶脑出血的强大危险因素。
Circulation. 2016 Nov 8;134(19):1444-1452. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024073. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
4
Race-Specific Predictors of Mortality in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Differential Impacts of Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Age Among Blacks and Whites.脑出血死亡率的种族特异性预测因素:黑人与白人中脑室出血和年龄的不同影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Aug 16;5(8):e003540. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003540.
5
Minority Patients are Less Likely to Undergo Withdrawal of Care After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.少数民族患者在自发性脑出血后接受撤机治疗的可能性较低。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Dec;29(3):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0554-4.
6
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.种族和民族差异在卒中护理中的表现:美国经验:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会向医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2091-116. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
When Is Hope Enough? Hopefulness, Discrimination and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Allostatic Load.当希望足够时?在应激负荷中,希望、歧视与种族/民族差异。
Behav Med. 2020 Jul-Sep;46(3-4):189-201. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2020.1729086.
8
Racial/ethnic disparities in hospital utilization in intracerebral hemorrhage.颅内出血住院利用的种族/民族差异。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Oct;14(7):686-695. doi: 10.1177/1747493019835335. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Race is a Predictor of Withdrawal of Life Support in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.种族是脑出血患者生命支持撤除的一个预测因素。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Nov;27(11):3108-3114. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Temporal changes in allostatic load patterns by age, race/ethnicity, and gender among the US adult population; 1988-2018.1988 年至 2018 年美国成年人群体中,按年龄、种族/民族和性别划分的应激负荷模式的时间变化。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106483. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106483. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
County Incarceration Rate and Stroke Death: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Influence of Physical Environment, Health Care Access, and Community Mental Distress.县监禁率与中风死亡:一项关于物理环境、医疗保健可及性和社区精神困扰影响的横断面研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039065. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039065. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Addressing disparities in the global epidemiology of stroke.解决卒中全球流行病学中的差异问题。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Apr;20(4):207-221. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00921-z. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Looking Upstream to Understand Race/Ethnicity as a Moderator for Poststroke Neuroinflammation and a Social Determinant for Poststroke Aphasia Outcomes.从上游角度理解种族/民族对卒中后神经炎症的调节作用以及对卒中后失语症结局的社会决定因素。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jan 3;33(1):74-86. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00315. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Factors Contributing to Race Differences in Poststroke Disability.探索导致中风后残疾种族差异的因素。
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1813-1819. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027700. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Race and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Incidence in the Northern Manhattan Study.北方曼哈顿研究中的中风发病率的种族和民族差异。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1064-1069. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028806. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
How does homeostasis happen? Integrative physiological, systems biological, and evolutionary perspectives.内稳态是如何发生的?综合生理学、系统生物学和进化观点。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019 Apr 1;316(4):R301-R317. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00396.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Chronic Physiologic Effects of Stress Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.同性恋、双性恋成年人慢性生理应激效应:来自国家健康和营养调查的结果。
Psychosom Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;80(6):551-563. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000600.
5
Risk Factors for Poststroke Cognitive Decline: The REGARDS Study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke).卒中后认知衰退的危险因素:REGARDS 研究(卒中地理和种族差异的原因)。
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):987-994. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018529. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Variation in the Calculation of Allostatic Load Score: 21 Examples from NHANES.计算应激负荷评分的变化:来自 NHANES 的 21 个实例。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Jun;4(3):455-461. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0246-8. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Race-Ethnicity, Poverty, Urban Stressors, and Telomere Length in a Detroit Community-based Sample.底特律社区样本中的种族-族裔、贫困、城市压力源与端粒长度
J Health Soc Behav. 2015 Jun;56(2):199-224. doi: 10.1177/0022146515582100. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Discrimination, racial identity, and cytokine levels among African-American adolescents.非裔美国青少年中的歧视、种族认同和细胞因子水平。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.017.
9
Perceived discrimination among African American adolescents and allostatic load: a longitudinal analysis with buffering effects.非裔美国青少年的感知歧视与应激负荷:一项具有缓冲效应的纵向分析
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):989-1002. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12213. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
10
Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence.种族主义与健康I:路径与科学证据
Am Behav Sci. 2013 Aug 1;57(8). doi: 10.1177/0002764213487340.

累积性应激负荷预测颅内出血认知结局的种族差异。

Allostatic load predicts racial disparities in intracerebral hemorrhage cognitive outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vincente Blvd. #A6600, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Neurology Clinical Outcomes Research and Population Sciences (Neuro CORPS), Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;12(1):16556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20987-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-20987-x
PMID:36192526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9530211/
Abstract

A large portion of stroke disparities remains unexplained, even after adjusting for demographic, comorbidity, and health care access variables. There is a critical need to close this knowledge gap by investigating novel factors that may contribute to stroke disparities. Allostatic load (AL) is the lifetime adverse physiologic impact of needing to adjust to socially structured stressors such as racism. AL has been shown to increase health vulnerability and worsen outcomes in marginalized populations. We sought to assess the differential impact of AL on cognitive outcomes post intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) across race-ethnicity. The Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes Project (ICHOP) prospectively collected data from patients presenting to Columbia Medical Center with ICH from 3/2009 to 5/2016. Data included demographics, stroke scores, labs, complications, neuroimaging, medical history, and discharge data. Five markers of AL (HbA1c, WBC, SBP, HR, ALB) were obtained. An AL score was generated by summing the elements in each patient that fell outside normal ranges, with AL score ranging 0-5. A linear regression model, adjusted for stroke severity and ICH volumes, was used to evaluate the relationship between AL and Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) at discharge, stratified by race-ethnicity. Among 248 white, 195 black, and 261 Hispanic ICH patients, neither mean AL nor mean TICS differed by race/ethnicity (p = 0.51, p = 0.79 respectively). In the overall cohort AL did not predict TICS at discharge (Beta -1.0, SE 1.1, p = 0.353). In Whites (beta 1.18, SE 2.5, p = 0.646) and Hispanics (beta -0.95, SE 1.6, p = 0.552) AL was not associated with TICS at discharge. In Black patients, higher AL was associated with a decrease in TICS at discharge (beta -3.2, SE 1.5, p = 0.049). AL is an important determinant of post ICH outcomes for certain minority populations. AL may explain some of the unexplained health disparities in stroke populations.

摘要

尽管在调整了人口统计学、合并症和医疗保健获取变量后,大部分中风差异仍然无法解释。通过研究可能导致中风差异的新因素来填补这一知识空白至关重要。适应负荷(AL)是一生中需要适应社会结构压力源(如种族主义)的不利生理影响。AL 已被证明会增加弱势群体的健康脆弱性并恶化其预后。我们试图评估 AL 对不同种族-族裔间脑出血(ICH)后认知结果的差异影响。颅内出血结果项目(ICHOP)前瞻性地从 2009 年 3 月至 2016 年 5 月在哥伦比亚医疗中心就诊的 ICH 患者中收集数据。数据包括人口统计学、中风评分、实验室检查、并发症、神经影像学、病史和出院数据。获得了 5 个 AL 标志物(HbA1c、WBC、SBP、HR、ALB)。通过将每位患者超出正常范围的元素相加来生成 AL 评分,AL 评分范围为 0-5。使用调整了中风严重程度和 ICH 量的线性回归模型,按种族-族裔分层,评估 AL 与出院时改良电话认知状态测试(TICS-m)之间的关系。在 248 名白人、195 名黑人、261 名西班牙裔 ICH 患者中,AL 的平均值和 TICS 的平均值均与种族/族裔无关(p=0.51,p=0.79)。在整个队列中,AL 并不预示出院时的 TICS(β-1.0,SE1.1,p=0.353)。在白人(β1.18,SE2.5,p=0.646)和西班牙裔(β-0.95,SE1.6,p=0.552)中,AL 与出院时的 TICS 无关。在黑人患者中,较高的 AL 与出院时 TICS 的降低相关(β-3.2,SE1.5,p=0.049)。AL 是某些少数族裔人群脑出血后结局的重要决定因素。AL 可能解释了中风人群中一些无法解释的健康差异。