From the Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, FL (H.G., R.L.S., T.R.).
Stroke Unit, Vila Nova de Gaia and Espinho Hospital Center, Portugal (V.B.).
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1064-1069. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028806. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Background and Purpose- An excess incidence of strokes among blacks versus whites has been shown, but data on disparities related to Hispanic ethnicity remain limited. This study examines race/ethnic differences in stroke incidence in the multiethnic, largely Caribbean Hispanic, NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Study), and whether disparities vary by age. Methods- The study population included participants in the prospective population-based NOMAS, followed for a mean of 14±7 years. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to estimate the association between race/ethnicity and incident stroke of any subtype and ischemic stroke, stratified by age. Results- Among 3298 participants (mean baseline age 69±10 years, 37% men, 24% black, 21% white, 52% Hispanic), 460 incident strokes accrued (400 ischemic, 43 intracerebral hemorrhage, 9 subarachnoid hemorrhage). The most common ischemic subtype was cardioembolic, followed by lacunar infarcts, then cryptogenic. The greatest incidence rate was observed in blacks (13/1000 person-years), followed by Hispanics (10/1000 person-years), and lowest in whites (9/1000 person-years), and this order was observed for crude incidence rates until age 75. By age 85, the greatest incidence rate was in Hispanics. Blacks had an increased risk of stroke versus whites overall in multivariable models that included sociodemographics (hazard ratio, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.13-2.02]), and stratified analyses showed that this disparity was driven by women of age ≥70. The increased rate of stroke among Hispanics (age/sex-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.13-1.93]) was largely explained by education and insurance status (a proxy for socieoeconomic status; hazard ratio after further adjusting for these variables, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.85-1.62]) but remained significant for women age ≥70. Conclusions- This study provides novel data regarding the increased stroke risk among Caribbean Hispanics in this elderly population. Results highlight the need to create culturally tailored campaigns to reach black and Hispanic populations to reduce race/ethnic stroke disparities and support the important role of low socioeconomic status in driving an elevated risk among Caribbean Hispanics.
背景与目的-已经表明,黑种人中风的发病率高于白种人,但与西班牙裔族群相关的差异数据仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨多民族、以加勒比西班牙裔为主的 NOMAS(北曼哈顿研究)人群中种族/民族差异与中风发病率的关系,以及这种差异是否随年龄而变化。
方法-研究人群包括前瞻性人群为基础的 NOMAS 的参与者,平均随访 14±7 年。构建多变量调整的 Cox 比例风险模型,以估计种族/民族与任何类型中风和缺血性中风的发病风险之间的关系,并按年龄分层。
结果-在 3298 名参与者(平均基线年龄 69±10 岁,37%为男性,24%为黑人,21%为白人,52%为西班牙裔)中,发生了 460 例中风事件(400 例为缺血性中风,43 例为颅内出血,9 例为蛛网膜下腔出血)。最常见的缺血性中风亚型是心源性栓塞,其次是腔隙性梗死,然后是隐源性。黑人的发病率最高(13/1000 人年),其次是西班牙裔(10/1000 人年),白人最低(9/1000 人年),这种顺序一直持续到 75 岁。到 85 岁时,西班牙裔的发病率最高。在包括社会人口统计学因素在内的多变量模型中,黑人总体上比白人患中风的风险更高(风险比,1.51[95%可信区间,1.13-2.02]),分层分析表明,这种差异主要是由年龄≥70 岁的女性驱动的。西班牙裔中风发病率较高(年龄/性别调整的风险比,1.48[95%可信区间,1.13-1.93])在很大程度上可以用教育和保险状况来解释(社会经济地位的代表;进一步调整这些变量后的风险比为 1.17[95%可信区间,0.85-1.62]),但对年龄≥70 岁的女性仍有显著意义。
结论-本研究提供了关于老年加勒比西班牙裔人群中风风险增加的新数据。研究结果强调需要制定针对不同文化的宣传活动,以接触黑人和西班牙裔人群,减少种族/民族间的中风差异,并支持低社会经济地位在加勒比西班牙裔人群中增加中风风险的重要作用。