Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后平民的 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表六种语言版本的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance of six language versions of the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 in civilians after traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 4;12(1):16571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20170-2.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric impairments such as symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can be screened using self-report instruments such as the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The current study aims to inspect the factorial validity and cross-linguistic equivalence of the PCL-5 in individuals after TBI with differential severity. Data for six language groups (n ≥ 200; Dutch, English, Finnish, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish) were extracted from the CENTER-TBI study database. Factorial validity of PTSD was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and compared between four concurrent structural models. A multi-group CFA approach was utilized to investigate the measurement invariance (MI) of the PCL-5 across languages. All structural models showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit with small between-model variation. The original DSM-5 model for PTSD provided solid evidence of MI across the language groups. The current study underlines the validity of the clinical DSM-5 conceptualization of PTSD and demonstrates the comparability of PCL-5 symptom scores between language versions in individuals after TBI. Future studies should apply MI methods to other sociodemographic (e.g., age, gender) and injury-related (e.g., TBI severity) characteristics to improve the monitoring and clinical care of individuals suffering from PTSD symptoms after TBI.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)常伴有神经精神障碍,如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状,可使用 PTSD 检查表 DSM-5(PCL-5)等自评工具进行筛查。本研究旨在检查 TBI 不同严重程度个体中 PCL-5 的因子有效性和跨语言等效性。从 CENTER-TBI 研究数据库中提取了六个语言组(n≥200;荷兰语、英语、芬兰语、意大利语、挪威语、西班牙语)的数据。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估 PTSD 的因子有效性,并在四个同时进行的结构模型之间进行比较。采用多组 CFA 方法研究 PCL-5 在语言间的测量不变性(MI)。所有结构模型的拟合优度均较好,模型间差异较小。PTSD 的原始 DSM-5 模型为跨语言组提供了 MI 的有力证据。本研究强调了 PTSD 的临床 DSM-5 概念化的有效性,并证明了 TBI 后个体中 PCL-5 症状评分在语言版本之间的可比性。未来的研究应将 MI 方法应用于其他社会人口统计学(如年龄、性别)和与损伤相关的特征(如 TBI 严重程度),以改善 PTSD 症状患者的监测和临床护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验