Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在孕妇中的有效性。

Validity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women.

作者信息

Gelaye Bizu, Zheng Yinnan, Medina-Mora Maria Elena, Rondon Marta B, Sánchez Sixto E, Williams Michelle A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, K505F, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PTSD Checklist-civilian (PCL-C) is one of the most commonly used self-report measures of PTSD symptoms, however, little is known about its validity when used in pregnancy. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the PCL-C as a screen for detecting PTSD symptoms among pregnant women.

METHODS

A total of 3372 pregnant women who attended their first prenatal care visit in Lima, Peru participated in the study. We assessed the reliability of the PCL-C items using Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity and performance characteristics of PCL-C were assessed against an independent, blinded Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) interview using measures of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. We tested construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches.

RESULTS

The reliability of the PCL-C was excellent (Cronbach's alpha =0.90). ROC analysis showed that a cut-off score of 26 offered optimal discriminatory power, with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92) and a specificity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.65). The area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78). A three-factor solution was extracted using exploratory factor analysis and was further complemented with three other models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In a CFA, a three-factor model based on DSM-IV symptom structure had reasonable fit statistics with comparative fit index of 0.86 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.09.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish-language version of the PCL-C may be used as a screening tool for pregnant women. The PCL-C has good reliability, criterion validity and factorial validity. The optimal cut-off score obtained by maximizing the sensitivity and specificity should be considered cautiously; women who screened positive may require further investigation to confirm PTSD diagnosis.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍检查表- civilian(PCL-C)是最常用的创伤后应激障碍症状自我报告测量工具之一,然而,对于其在孕期使用时的有效性知之甚少。本研究旨在评估PCL-C作为检测孕妇创伤后应激障碍症状筛查工具的可靠性和有效性。

方法

共有3372名在秘鲁利马进行首次产前检查的孕妇参与了本研究。我们使用Cronbach's alpha评估PCL-C项目的可靠性。PCL-C的标准效度和性能特征通过独立、盲法的临床医生管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS)访谈进行评估,采用敏感性、特异性和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线测量。我们使用探索性和验证性因素分析方法测试结构效度。

结果

PCL-C的可靠性极佳(Cronbach's alpha = 0.90)。ROC分析表明,截断分数为26时具有最佳区分能力,敏感性为0.86(95%CI:0.78 - 0.92),特异性为0.63(95%CI:0.62 - 0.65)。ROC曲线下面积为0.75(95%CI:0.71 - 0.78)。使用探索性因素分析提取了一个三因素解决方案,并通过验证性因素分析(CFA)用其他三个模型进一步补充。在CFA中,基于DSM-IV症状结构的三因素模型具有合理的拟合统计量,比较拟合指数为0.86,近似均方根误差为0.09。

结论

PCL-C西班牙语版本可作为孕妇的筛查工具。PCL-C具有良好的可靠性、标准效度和因子效度。通过最大化敏感性和特异性获得的最佳截断分数应谨慎考虑;筛查呈阳性的女性可能需要进一步检查以确诊创伤后应激障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88be/5427611/974ff03a55eb/12888_2017_1304_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验