GALVESTON, TEXAS.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2022;132:194-201.
This review article summarizes the conclusions of the National Academy of Medicine committee on diagnostic error. The committee deliberated during five in-person meetings and during numerous conference calls between April 2014 and April 2015. At three of the meetings, the committee invited multiple speakers to inform its deliberations. The 21 members of the committee represented a broad range of expertise related in some way to diagnostic errors, their potential causes, or their consequences. The members' specialized knowledge included patient safety, health care quality and measurement, patient engagement, health policy, health care professional education, cognitive psychology, health disparities, human factors and ergonomics, health information technology, decision analysis, nursing, radiology, anatomic pathology, laboratory medicine (clinical pathology), law, and health economics.
这篇综述文章总结了美国国家医学院委员会关于诊断错误的结论。委员会在 2014 年 4 月至 2015 年 4 月期间进行了五次面对面会议和多次电话会议的审议。在三次会议中，委员会邀请了多位演讲者为其审议提供信息。委员会的 21 名成员代表了与诊断错误、其潜在原因或后果在某种程度上相关的广泛专业知识。成员们的专业知识包括患者安全、医疗质量和测量、患者参与、医疗政策、医疗专业教育、认知心理学、健康差异、人为因素和工效学、医疗信息技术、决策分析、护理、放射学、解剖病理学、实验室医学（临床病理学）、法律和卫生经济学。
