Chassin M R, Galvin R W
Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):1000-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.1000.
To identify issues related to the quality of health care in the United States, including its measurement, assessment, and improvement, requiring action by health care professionals or other constituencies in the public or private sectors.
The National Roundtable on Health Care Quality, convened by the Institute of Medicine, a component of the National Academy of Sciences, comprised 20 representatives of the private and public sectors, practicing medicine and nursing, representing academia, business, consumer advocacy, and the health media, and including the heads of federal health programs. The roundtable met 6 times between February 1996 and January 1998. It explored ongoing, rapid changes in health care and the implications of these changes for the quality of health and health care in the United States.
Roundtable members held discussions with a wide variety of experts, convened conferences, commissioned papers, and drew on their individual professional experience.
At the end of its deliberations, roundtable members reached consensus on the conclusions described in this article by a series of discussions at committee meetings and reviews of successive draft documents, the first of which was created by the listed authors and the Institute of Medicine project director. The drafts were revised following these discussions, and the final document was approved according to the formal report review procedures of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
The quality of health care can be precisely defined and measured with a degree of scientific accuracy comparable with that of most measures used in clinical medicine. Serious and widespread quality problems exist throughout American medicine. These problems, which may be classified as underuse, overuse, or misuse, occur in small and large communities alike, in all parts of the country, and with approximately equal frequency in managed care and fee-for-service systems of care. Very large numbers of Americans are harmed as a direct result. Quality of care is the problem, not managed care. Current efforts to improve will not succeed unless we undertake a major, systematic effort to overhaul how we deliver health care services, educate and train clinicians, and assess and improve quality.
确定与美国医疗保健质量相关的问题,包括其衡量、评估和改进,这些问题需要医疗保健专业人员或公共或私营部门的其他相关方采取行动。
由美国国家科学院下属的医学研究所召集的医疗保健质量全国圆桌会议,由20名来自公共和私营部门、从事医学和护理工作的代表组成,他们代表学术界、企业、消费者权益倡导组织和健康媒体,其中包括联邦医疗保健项目负责人。该圆桌会议在1996年2月至1998年1月期间共召开了6次会议。会议探讨了医疗保健领域正在发生的快速变化以及这些变化对美国健康和医疗保健质量的影响。
圆桌会议成员与众多专家进行了讨论,召开了会议,委托撰写了论文,并借鉴了他们个人的专业经验。
在审议结束时,圆桌会议成员通过委员会会议上的一系列讨论以及对连续几稿文件(第一稿由列出的作者和医学研究所项目主任撰写)的审查,就本文所述的结论达成了共识。在这些讨论之后对草稿进行了修订,最终文件根据美国国家科学院国家研究委员会的正式报告审查程序获得批准。
医疗保健质量可以得到精确界定和衡量,其科学准确性程度与临床医学中使用的大多数测量方法相当。美国整个医疗行业存在严重且普遍的质量问题。这些问题可归类为使用不足、过度使用或误用,在大小社区均有发生,遍布全国各地,在管理式医疗和按服务收费的医疗体系中出现的频率大致相同。大量美国人因此直接受到伤害。医疗保健质量才是问题所在,而非管理式医疗。除非我们进行重大的系统性努力,全面改革我们提供医疗保健服务的方式、对临床医生进行教育和培训以及评估和改进质量,否则当前的改进努力将不会成功。