Langston C, Thurlbeck W M
J Microsc. 1978 Sep;114(1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1978.tb00119.x.
We have used several commercially available image analysers to measure the inter-alveolar wall distance on histologic sections of animal and human lungs. Inter- and intra-observer variations using these machines are small, and very similar results are obtained using different machines. The recorded result depends on the magnification used since higher resolution produces more intercepts. The plane in which the measurement is made affects the result, representing the difference in shrinkage from fixed tissue to stained slides in the horizontal and vertical planes. Machine-measured inter-alveolar wall distances are smaller than those measured by humans because of the spurious intercepts made by the image analysers. However, the measurements are highly correlated and human-measured inter-alveolar wall distances can be closely predicted from the machine-measured ones. The number of alveoli per unit volume is less well predicted from the average inter-alveolar wall distance. Image analysers may possibly play a useful role in making similar simple measurements in other organs.
我们使用了几种市面上可买到的图像分析仪,来测量动物和人类肺部组织切片上的肺泡壁间距。使用这些仪器时,观察者之间和观察者内部的差异都很小,并且使用不同仪器可得到非常相似的结果。记录的结果取决于所使用的放大倍数,因为更高的分辨率会产生更多的截距。进行测量的平面会影响结果,这体现了固定组织到染色玻片在水平和垂直平面上收缩程度的差异。由于图像分析仪产生的虚假截距,机器测量的肺泡壁间距比人工测量的要小。然而,这些测量结果高度相关,并且人工测量的肺泡壁间距可以根据机器测量的结果进行精确预测。根据平均肺泡壁间距对每单位体积内肺泡数量的预测效果较差。图像分析仪在对其他器官进行类似的简单测量中可能会发挥有用的作用。