• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知行为控制的调节作用:科学家的态度、规范和公众参与意愿。

Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.

机构信息

Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275643. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275643
PMID:36197896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9534423/
Abstract

Scientists play important roles in conducting public engagement, but evidence shows that scientists perceive great challenges in doing so. Drawing broadly from the theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study examines factors predicting scientists' willingness to conduct public engagement. This study further examines how perceived behavioral control (PBC) of conducting public engagement would moderate the relationships between the proposed predictors and scientists' willingness to conduct public engagement. Using survey data collected from 706 scientists based in Singapore, this study found that attitude toward and personal norms of conducting public engagement, as well as PBC, significantly predicted scientists' willingness to conduct public engagement. Notably, PBC interacted with attitude toward conducting public engagement, the perceived descriptive norms, the perceived positive media influence, and the perceived negative external norms of conducting public engagement, as well as personal norms of conducting public engagement to predict scientists' willingness to conduct public engagement. We postulated the key role that the perception of the ease or difficulty plays in motivating scientists to conduct the skill-intensive endeavor explains the significant moderating effects. The theoretical implications on the TPB and the practical implications for public engagement are further discussed.

摘要

科学家在开展公众参与活动方面发挥着重要作用,但有证据表明,他们在这样做时面临着巨大的挑战。本研究广泛借鉴计划行为理论(TPB),考察了预测科学家参与公众参与意愿的因素。本研究进一步考察了进行公众参与的感知行为控制(PBC)如何调节提出的预测因素与科学家进行公众参与意愿之间的关系。本研究使用从新加坡的 706 名科学家那里收集的调查数据发现,对进行公众参与的态度和个人规范,以及进行公众参与的感知行为控制,显著预测了科学家进行公众参与的意愿。值得注意的是,PBC 与进行公众参与的态度、感知描述性规范、感知积极媒体影响以及感知进行公众参与的消极外部规范以及进行公众参与的个人规范相互作用,从而预测了科学家进行公众参与的意愿。我们假设,对进行技能密集型活动的难易程度的看法在激励科学家进行这项活动方面起着关键作用,这解释了显著的调节作用。进一步讨论了对 TPB 的理论意义和对公众参与的实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/36d0911c1bbc/pone.0275643.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/79db57958eea/pone.0275643.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/37db99b0b86b/pone.0275643.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/5f6d48b1f427/pone.0275643.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/0ca04fe72d35/pone.0275643.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/36d0911c1bbc/pone.0275643.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/79db57958eea/pone.0275643.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/37db99b0b86b/pone.0275643.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/5f6d48b1f427/pone.0275643.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/0ca04fe72d35/pone.0275643.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c47/9534423/36d0911c1bbc/pone.0275643.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.感知行为控制的调节作用:科学家的态度、规范和公众参与意愿。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275643. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis.计划行为理论中感知行为控制的调节作用:元分析。
Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;41(2):155-167. doi: 10.1037/hea0001153. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.科学家对公众的认知不足阻碍了他们纠正错误信息的行为意愿。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
4
The Moderated Influence of Perceived Behavioral Control on Intentions Among the General U.S. Population: Implications for Public Communication Campaigns.感知行为控制对美国普通人群意图的调节影响:对公共传播活动的启示。
J Health Commun. 2016 Sep;21(9):1006-15. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1204378. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Chinese scientists' mediated participation in public outreach: Multiple direct and personal norm-mediated predictors.中国科学家的中介参与公众外展:多个直接和个人规范中介预测因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Nov;33(8):1009-1026. doi: 10.1177/09636625241237927. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
6
Examining the moderating effect of perceived risk from particulate matter on outdoor sports participants: a theory of planned behavior perspective.探究颗粒物感知风险对户外运动参与者的调节作用:计划行为理论视角。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 26;12:1340502. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340502. eCollection 2024.
7
Understanding Factors Associated with Singaporean Adolescents' Intention to Adopt Privacy Protection Behavior Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.理解与新加坡青少年采用隐私保护行为意向相关的因素:基于计划行为理论的扩展
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Sep;20(9):572-579. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0061. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Vaccination Intention and Behavior of the General Public in China: Cross-sectional Survey and Moderated Mediation Model Analysis.中国公众的疫苗接种意愿和行为:横断面调查和有调节的中介模型分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 20;8(6):e34666. doi: 10.2196/34666.
9
The use of the theory of planned behavior to predict engagement in functional behaviors in schizophrenia.采用计划行为理论预测精神分裂症患者的功能性行为参与。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Jan 30;205(1-2):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
10
Personal and Media Factors Related to Citizens' Pro-environmental Behavioral Intention against Haze in China: A Moderating Analysis of TPB.个人和媒体因素与中国公民对雾霾的环保行为意向的关系:对 TPB 的调节分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072314.

引用本文的文献

1
Intervention to Improve Menstrual Health Among Adolescent Girls Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior in Iran: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial.基于计划行为理论的伊朗青少年女孩经期健康干预:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Nov;55(6):595-603. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.365. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis.计划行为理论中感知行为控制的调节作用:元分析。
Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;41(2):155-167. doi: 10.1037/hea0001153. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Exploring scholars' public engagement goals in Canada and the United States.探究加拿大和美国学者的公众参与目标。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):855-867. doi: 10.1177/0963662520950671. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns.
新加坡不同学科的研究人员的公众参与:宏观和中观层面关注点的定性比较。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Feb;29(2):211-229. doi: 10.1177/0963662519888761. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
4
Examining interactions within the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of intentions to engage in cannabis-related driving behaviors.考察计划行为理论内部的相互作用对意图从事与大麻相关的驾驶行为的预测。
J Am Coll Health. 2020 May-Jun;68(4):374-380. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1557197. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
5
Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.微生物学家的公众参与观点与行为。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1402. eCollection 2018.
6
Scientists' views about communication objectives.科学家对传播目标的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Aug;27(6):708-730. doi: 10.1177/0963662517728478. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
7
How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?科学家们如何在工作场所使用社交媒体?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0162680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162680. eCollection 2016.
8
The Moderated Influence of Perceived Behavioral Control on Intentions Among the General U.S. Population: Implications for Public Communication Campaigns.感知行为控制对美国普通人群意图的调节影响:对公共传播活动的启示。
J Health Commun. 2016 Sep;21(9):1006-15. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1204378. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
9
Climate stories: Why do climate scientists and sceptical voices participate in the climate debate?气候故事:为什么气候科学家和持怀疑态度的声音会参与气候辩论?
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):826-842. doi: 10.1177/0963662516632453. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes.公众参与的动员:研究机构实践的基准测试。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Oct;26(7):771-788. doi: 10.1177/0963662516633834. Epub 2016 Mar 7.