Suppr超能文献

科学家对公众的认知不足阻碍了他们纠正错误信息的行为意愿。

Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.

机构信息

School of Communications, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Journalism and Media Communication, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between scientists' communication experience and attitudes towards misinformation and their intention to correct misinformation. Specifically, the study focuses on two correction strategies: source-based correction and relational approaches. Source-based approaches combatting misinformation prioritize sharing accurate information from trustworthy sources to encourage audiences to trust reliable information over false information. On the other hand, relational approaches give priority to developing relationships or promoting dialogue as a means of addressing misinformation. In this study, we surveyed 416 scientists from U.S. land-grant universities using a self-report questionnaire. We find that scientists' engagement in science communication activities is positively related to their intention to correct misinformation using both strategies. Moreover, the scientists' attitude towards misinformation mediates the relationship between engagement in communication activities and intention to correct misinformation. The study also finds that the deficit model perception-that is, the assumption that scientists only need to transmit scientific knowledge to an ignorant public in order to increase understanding and support for science-moderates the indirect effect of engagement in science communication activities on behavioral intention to correct misinformation using relational strategies through attitude towards misinformation. Thus, the deficit model perception is a barrier to engaging in relational strategies to correct misinformation. We suggest that addressing the deficit model perception and providing science communication training that promotes inclusive worldviews and relational approaches would increase scientists' behavioral intentions to address misinformation. The study concludes that scientists should recognize their dual positionality as scientists and members of their community and engage in respectful conversations with community members about science.

摘要

本文研究了科学家的沟通经验和对错误信息的态度与其纠正错误信息的意愿之间的关系。具体而言,该研究关注两种纠正策略:基于来源的纠正和关系方法。基于来源的方法强调分享来自可信来源的准确信息,以鼓励受众信任可靠信息而非虚假信息。另一方面,关系方法则优先发展关系或促进对话,以此来解决错误信息问题。本研究使用自陈式问卷调查了美国赠地大学的 416 位科学家。研究发现,科学家参与科学传播活动与其使用这两种策略纠正错误信息的意愿呈正相关。此外,科学家对错误信息的态度在参与传播活动与纠正错误信息的意愿之间起中介作用。研究还发现,缺陷模型观念(即假设科学家只需向无知的公众传播科学知识,就可以提高对科学的理解和支持)会削弱通过对错误信息的态度对基于关系策略的纠正错误信息的行为意愿的间接效应。因此,缺陷模型观念是参与关系策略纠正错误信息的障碍。我们建议,解决缺陷模型观念并提供促进包容性世界观和关系方法的科学传播培训,将增加科学家纠正错误信息的行为意愿。研究得出结论,科学家应该认识到他们作为科学家和社区成员的双重身份,并与社区成员就科学进行尊重的对话。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验