Gonçalves Fernanda de Toledo, Pacheco-Barrios Kevin, Rebello-Sanchez Ingrid, Castelo-Branco Luis, de Melo Paulo S, Parente Joao, Cardenas-Rojas Alejandra, Firigato Isabela, Pessotto Anne Victorio, Imamura Marta, Simis Marcel, Battistella Linamara, Fregni Felipe
Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Laboratório de Imunohematologia e Hematologia Forense (LIM40), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC da FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jan-Apr;23(1):100330. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100330. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of global disability. New biomarkers are needed to improve treatment allocation, and genetic polymorphisms are promising candidates.
We aimed to assess the association of OPRM1 (A118G and C17T) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF [G196A]) polymorphisms with pain-related outcomes and motor cortex excitability metrics (measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation) in 113 knee OA patients with chronic pain. We performed adjusted multivariate regression analyses to compare carriers versus non-carriers in terms of clinical and neurophysiological characteristics at baseline, and treatment response (pain reduction and increased cortical inhibitory tonus) after rehabilitation.
Compared to non-carriers, participants with polymorphisms on both OPRM1 (A118G) and BDNF (G196A) genes were less likely to improve pain after rehabilitation (85 and 72% fewer odds of improvement, respectively). Likewise, both carriers of OPRM1 polymorphisms (A118G and C17T) were also less likely to improve cortical inhibition (short intracortical inhibition [SICI], and intracortical facilitation [ICF], respectively). While pain and cortical inhibition improvement did not correlate in the total sample, the presence of OPRM1 (A118G) and BDNF (G196A) polymorphisms moderated this relationship.
These results underscore the promising role of combining genetic and neurophysiological markers to endotype the treatment response in this population.
背景/目的:骨关节炎(OA)所致慢性疼痛是全球残疾的常见原因。需要新的生物标志物来改善治疗分配,基因多态性是很有前景的候选指标。
我们旨在评估113例患有慢性疼痛的膝骨关节炎患者中,阿片受体μ1(OPRM1,A118G和C17T)及脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF,G196A)基因多态性与疼痛相关结局及运动皮层兴奋性指标(通过经颅磁刺激测量)之间的关联。我们进行了校正的多变量回归分析,以比较携带者与非携带者在基线时的临床和神经生理学特征,以及康复后的治疗反应(疼痛减轻和皮层抑制张力增加)。
与非携带者相比,OPRM1(A118G)和BDNF(G196A)基因均存在多态性的参与者康复后疼痛改善的可能性较小(改善几率分别减少85%和72%)。同样,OPRM1基因多态性(A118G和C17T)的携带者改善皮层抑制(分别为短皮质内抑制[SICI]和皮质内易化[ICF])的可能性也较小。虽然在总样本中疼痛改善与皮层抑制改善无相关性,但OPRM1(A118G)和BDNF(G196A)基因多态性的存在调节了这种关系。
这些结果强调了联合基因和神经生理学标志物对该人群治疗反应进行内型分类的潜在作用。