Akhade Amol, Van Wambeke Simon, Gyawali Bishal
BYL Nair Hospital and TN Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400008, India.
Department of Oncology, ZNA, Antwerp B-2020, Belgium.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Aug 30;16:ed124. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.ed124. eCollection 2022.
CDK4/6 inhibitors have become the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced hormone receptor positive and Human Epidermal Receptor -2 [ HER-2 ] negative breast cancer. Three CDK 4/6 inhibitor drugs are currently approved and available, including Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Abemaciclib. All three of these drugs have similar mechanism of action and other pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-dynamic properties and hold equivalent positions in cancer care guidelines. Surprisingly, however, in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer, two trials of palbociclib have failed to show any benefit while abemaciclib has shown some early benefits in disease-free survival and has received approval for its use in adjuvant setting. In this article, we explore several reasons for this discrepancy in the results of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. We also question if we should already adopt adjuvant abemaciclib in our clinical practice given the uncertainty in data.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂已成为晚期激素受体阳性且人表皮受体-2(HER-2)阴性乳腺癌患者的主要治疗手段。目前有三种CDK4/6抑制剂药物已获批上市,包括哌柏西利、瑞博西尼和阿贝西利。这三种药物的作用机制、其他药代动力学和药效学特性相似,在癌症治疗指南中处于同等地位。然而,令人惊讶的是,在早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗中,两项关于哌柏西利的试验未能显示出任何益处,而阿贝西利在无病生存期方面显示出一些早期益处,并已获批用于辅助治疗。在本文中,我们探讨了CDK4/6抑制剂在辅助治疗中结果存在差异的几个原因。鉴于数据的不确定性,我们也质疑是否应该在临床实践中采用辅助性阿贝西利治疗。