Sorbonne University/University of Warsaw, Centre français de recherche en sciences sociales (UMIFRE 13 CNRS-MEAE USR 3138 CNRS), Prague, Czech Republic.
Int J Psychoanal. 2022 Oct;103(5):828-850. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2022.2093205.
Shortly after World War II, psychoanalytic societies in Central Europe were gradually resuming their pre-war activities. Starting in 1945, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Poland saw the revival of their psychoanalytic circles which subsequently engaged in psychoanalytic knowledge transmission, especially in the face of the Communist state institutions' growing disapproval of psychoanalysis. This article traces the history of the psychoanalytic movement's rebirth in Central Europe. The author discusses the activities of Viennese, Budapestian, Praguian and Varsovian circles post-1945 in order to examine the practices of collective thinking and identify diverse models of the transmission of Freudianism. The attempt to explore the complex mechanisms of psychoanalytic knowledge dissemination in the immediate post-war period, both in its theoretical and practical dimensions, can contribute to a more profound understanding of the history of psychoanalysis in Central Europe after 1945. It also points to the significance of a more inquisitive approach to the internal dynamics of these intellectual circles which were forced to develop outside of state academic institutions due to socio-political reasons.
第二次世界大战后不久,中欧的精神分析学会逐渐恢复了战前的活动。从 1945 年开始,奥地利、匈牙利、捷克斯洛伐克和波兰重新出现了精神分析圈,这些圈子随后从事精神分析知识的传播,特别是在面对共产主义国家机构越来越不赞成精神分析的情况下。本文追溯了中欧精神分析运动复兴的历史。作者讨论了维也纳、布达佩斯、布拉格和华沙圈子在 1945 年后的活动,以考察集体思维的实践,并确定弗洛伊德主义传播的不同模式。试图探索战后时期精神分析知识传播的复杂机制,无论是在理论层面还是实践层面,都有助于更深入地了解 1945 年后中欧精神分析的历史。它还指出,由于社会政治原因,这些知识分子圈子被迫在国家学术机构之外发展,因此需要更深入地探究这些圈子的内部动态。