ParaMove, SCI Research Unit, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Spinal Cord Injury Center, Clinical Research Unit, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
J Neurotrauma. 2023 May;40(9-10):999-1006. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0326. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
The use of biomarkers in spinal cord injury (SCI) research has evolved rapidly in recent years whereby most studies focused on the acute post-injury phase. Since SCI is characterized by persisting neurological impairments, the question arises whether blood biomarkers remain altered during the subacute post-injury time. Sample collection in the subacute phase might provide a better insight in the ongoing SCI specific molecular mechanism with fewer confounding factors compared with the acute phase where, amongst other complications, individuals receive a substantial amount of medication. This study aimed to determine if the temporal dynamics of serum biomarkers of neurodegeneration differ between individuals depending on their extent of neurological recovery in the transition phase between acute and chronic SCI. We performed a secondary analysis of biomarkers in patients with SCI ( = 41) who were treated at a level I trauma center in Germany. Patients with cervical or thoracic SCI regardless of injury severity were included. Blood samples were collected in the acute phase (1-4 days post-injury), and after 30 and 120 days post-injury. Serum protein levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light protein (NfL) were determined for each time-point of sample collection using R-Plex Assays (Meso Scale Discovery). Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the trajectory of GFAP and NfL over time. Fixed effects of time, neurological recovery, and injury severity, along with the recovery-by-time interaction, were included in models with random slopes and intercepts. GFAP levels increase during the first days after SCI and decrease in subacute to chronic stages. Notably, the trajectory of GFAP over time is significantly associated with the extent of neurological recovery during the transition from acute to chronic SCI with a steeper decline in individuals who recovered better. Serum levels of NfL continue to rise significantly until Day 30 followed by a decrease afterwards, independent of neurological recovery. The trajectory of serum GFAP levels qualifies as a prognostic biomarker for neurological recovery, and facilitates monitoring of disease progression in the sub-acute post-injury phase.
近年来,生物标志物在脊髓损伤(SCI)研究中的应用迅速发展,大多数研究都集中在急性损伤后阶段。由于 SCI 的特征是持续存在神经功能障碍,因此出现了一个问题,即在亚急性损伤后时期,血液生物标志物是否仍然发生改变。与急性阶段相比,在亚急性阶段采集样本可以更好地了解持续的 SCI 特定分子机制,因为在急性阶段,除其他并发症外,个体还会接受大量药物治疗。本研究旨在确定在急性和慢性 SCI 之间的过渡阶段,根据个体的神经恢复程度,神经退行性血清生物标志物的时间动态是否存在差异。我们对德国一级创伤中心治疗的 SCI 患者(n=41)进行了生物标志物的二次分析。纳入了无论损伤严重程度如何的颈或胸 SCI 患者。在急性阶段(损伤后 1-4 天)以及损伤后 30 天和 120 天采集血液样本。使用 R-Plex 检测(Meso Scale Discovery)测定每个样本采集时间点的神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和神经丝轻链蛋白(NfL)的血清蛋白水平。线性混合模型用于评估 GFAP 和 NfL 随时间的轨迹。模型中包含固定效应的时间、神经恢复和损伤严重程度,以及恢复与时间的相互作用,同时还包含随机斜率和截距。GFAP 水平在 SCI 后最初几天内增加,并在亚急性到慢性阶段下降。值得注意的是,GFAP 随时间的轨迹与从急性到慢性 SCI 的神经恢复程度显著相关,在恢复较好的个体中下降更陡峭。血清 NfL 水平持续显著升高,直到第 30 天,之后下降,与神经恢复无关。血清 GFAP 水平的轨迹可作为神经恢复的预后生物标志物,有助于在亚急性损伤后阶段监测疾病进展。