Schoenfeldt Theodore L, Bowman Christine A, MacConnell Ashley E, Fishman Felicity G
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2024 May;19(3):488-492. doi: 10.1177/15589447221124272. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
Many variables affect the pressure caused by splinting or casting. The purpose of this study was to compare pressure underlying a splint wrapped with either an elastic bandage or a bias cut stockinette.
Thirty-two plaster volar resting splints were applied to a simulated extremity with a saline bag secured to it. A pressure transducer was connected to the saline bag to monitor changes in pressure once splints were applied, and 15 mL increments of saline were added to the bag to simulate swelling. Each dressing type was tested with normal application and tight application.
Normal application splints wrapped with either bias cut stockinette or an elastic bandage demonstrated similar initial splint pressures ( = .81). With simulated swelling, splints wrapped with bias cut stockinette demonstrated a 15 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-28.5) higher average pressure than those wrapped with an elastic bandage ( = .035). Tight application splints with an elastic bandage wrap demonstrated a 46 mmHg (95% CI, 16-77) higher initial splint pressure than those wrapped with bias cut stockinette ( = .009).
Splints wrapped using either an elastic bandage or bias cut stockinette appear to have a similar safety profile, although in cases of excessive swelling, an elastic bandage may provide additional compliance. Tight splint application appears to be more hazardous with the use of an elastic bandage compared with a bias cut stockinette. Further study of the use of elastic bandages and bias cut stockinettes in the clinical setting may be warranted.
许多变量会影响夹板或石膏固定所产生的压力。本研究的目的是比较用弹性绷带或斜裁弹力织物包裹的夹板下方的压力。
将32个石膏掌侧静息夹板应用于一个固定有盐水袋的模拟肢体。连接一个压力传感器到盐水袋,以便在施加夹板后监测压力变化,并向袋中每次增加15毫升盐水以模拟肿胀。每种敷料类型都分别进行常规包扎和紧密包扎测试。
用斜裁弹力织物或弹性绷带包裹的常规包扎夹板显示出相似的初始夹板压力(P = 0.81)。在模拟肿胀时,用斜裁弹力织物包裹的夹板显示出比用弹性绷带包裹的夹板平均压力高15 mmHg(95%置信区间[CI],1.5 - 28.5)(P = 0.035)。用弹性绷带包裹的紧密包扎夹板显示出比用斜裁弹力织物包裹的夹板初始夹板压力高46 mmHg(95% CI,16 - 77)(P = 0.009)。
使用弹性绷带或斜裁弹力织物包裹的夹板似乎具有相似的安全性,尽管在肿胀过度的情况下,弹性绷带可能提供额外的顺应性。与斜裁弹力织物相比,使用弹性绷带进行紧密夹板固定似乎更危险。可能有必要在临床环境中进一步研究弹性绷带和斜裁弹力织物的使用情况。