Suppr超能文献

患者对耳科学远程评估途径的看法:定性描述分析。

Patient perceptions of a remote assessment pathway in otology: a qualitative descriptive analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2173-2180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07684-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to gain in-depth feedback on patient perceptions of remote assessment in otology, to better inform the development of a telemedicine pathway for new otology referrals.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to analyse semi-structured interviews from 14 patients seen in a routine otology clinic.

RESULTS

Patients were generally accepting of the proposed telemedicine pathway. Key themes included maintaining quality of care, adequate training for facilitators, reducing waiting times, appropriate actioning of clinic outcomes and anxiety surrounding the use of technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed telemedicine pathway for new otology referrals is acceptable to patients, provided there is no compromise in the standard of their care versus a traditional pathway. These results further our understanding of remote assessment in otology from the patient perspective and may help to inform the development of such pathways outside of our centre.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在深入了解患者对耳科学远程评估的看法,为新耳科学转诊的远程医疗路径的开发提供更好的信息。

方法

采用定性描述方法分析了在常规耳科诊所就诊的 14 名患者的半结构化访谈。

结果

患者普遍接受拟议的远程医疗途径。主要主题包括保持护理质量、为促进者提供充分的培训、减少等待时间、适当处理门诊结果以及对技术使用的焦虑。

结论

我们为新耳科学转诊提出的远程医疗途径是可以被患者接受的,只要其护理标准与传统途径相比没有降低。这些结果进一步从患者角度了解了耳科学的远程评估,并可能有助于为我们中心以外的此类途径的开发提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6523/9540146/daff3f4f8d2b/405_2022_7684_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient perceptions of a remote assessment pathway in otology: a qualitative descriptive analysis.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2173-2180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07684-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
2
A retrospective cohort study of telephone versus face-to-face clinics for the management of new otology referrals.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Apr;280(4):1677-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07653-8. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
The remote neuro-otology assessment - managing dizziness in the coronavirus disease 2019 era.
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Dec;134(12):1120-1122. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120002273. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Telephone versus face-to-face clinics for the management of new rhinology referrals: a retrospective cohort study.
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jul;137(7):810-814. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002675. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Blind spots in telemedicine: a qualitative study of staff workarounds to resolve gaps in diabetes management.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3427-9.
7
Telescopic otology referrals: Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Mar 3;5(2):221-227. doi: 10.1002/lio2.367. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Telemedicine consultation for patients with diabetes mellitus: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jul;24(6):385-391. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17704346. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective cohort study of telephone versus face-to-face clinics for the management of new otology referrals.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Apr;280(4):1677-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07653-8. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

3
ENT Telephone Clinics During the Coronavirus Pandemic: An Analysis of 400 Telephone Consultations at a District General Hospital.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Nov;102(11):733-738. doi: 10.1177/01455613211028091. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
5
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282. doi: 10.1177/2333393617742282. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
7
Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 16;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
8
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
9
Whatever happened to qualitative description?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验