University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; and Personalized Healthcare Data Science and Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, and California Pacific Medical Center and Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov 1;140(5):758-767. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004958. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
To describe the testing rate, patient characteristics, temporal trends, timing, and results of germline and somatic BRCA testing in patients with ovarian cancer using real-world data.
We included a cross-sectional subset of adult patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 1, 2011, and November 30, 2018, who received frontline treatment and were followed for at least 1 year in a real-world database. The primary outcome was receipt of BRCA testing, classified by biosample source as germline (blood or saliva) or somatic (tissue). Lines of therapy (frontline, second line, third line) were derived based on dates of surgery and chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics were analyzed.
Among 2,557 patients, 72.2% (n=1,846) had at least one documented BRCA test. Among tested patients, 62.5% (n=1,154) had only germline testing, 10.6% (n=197) had only somatic testing, and 19.9% (n=368) had both. Most patients had testing before (9.7%, n=276) or during (48.6%, n=1,521) frontline therapy, with 17.6% (n=273) tested during second-line and 12.7% (n=129) tested during third-line therapy. Patients who received BRCA testing, compared with patients without testing, were younger (mean age 63 years vs 66 years, P <.001) and were more likely to be treated at an academic practice (10.4% vs 7.0%, P =.01), with differences by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ( P <.001), stage of disease ( P <.001), histology ( P <.001), geography ( P <.001), and type of frontline therapy ( P <.001), but no differences based on race or ethnicity. The proportion of patients who received BRCA testing within 1 year of diagnosis increased from 24.6% of patients in 2011 to 75.6% of patients in 2018.
In a large cohort of patients with ovarian cancer, significant practice disparities existed in testing for actionable BRCA mutations. Despite increased testing over time, many patients did not receive testing, suggesting missed opportunities to identify patients appropriate for targeted therapy and genetic counseling.
利用真实世界的数据描述卵巢癌患者进行种系和体细胞 BRCA 检测的检测率、患者特征、时间趋势、时间安排和结果。
我们纳入了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日期间被诊断患有卵巢癌的成年患者的横断面亚组,这些患者在真实世界的数据库中接受了一线治疗,并至少随访了 1 年。主要结局是接受 BRCA 检测,根据生物样本来源分为种系(血液或唾液)或体细胞(组织)。治疗线(一线、二线、三线)是根据手术和化疗的日期推导出来的。对描述性统计数据进行了分析。
在 2557 名患者中,72.2%(n=1846)至少有一次记录的 BRCA 检测。在接受检测的患者中,62.5%(n=1154)仅进行了种系检测,10.6%(n=197)仅进行了体细胞检测,19.9%(n=368)同时进行了两种检测。大多数患者在一线治疗前(9.7%,n=276)或期间(48.6%,n=1521)进行了检测,17.6%(n=273)在二线治疗期间进行了检测,12.7%(n=129)在三线治疗期间进行了检测。与未接受检测的患者相比,接受 BRCA 检测的患者更年轻(平均年龄 63 岁 vs 66 岁,P <.001),更有可能在学术实践中接受治疗(10.4% vs 7.0%,P =.01),并且在东部合作肿瘤学组表现评分(P <.001)、疾病分期(P <.001)、组织学(P <.001)、地理位置(P <.001)和一线治疗类型(P <.001)方面存在差异,但在种族或族裔方面没有差异。在诊断后 1 年内接受 BRCA 检测的患者比例从 2011 年的 24.6%增加到 2018 年的 75.6%。
在大量卵巢癌患者中,针对可操作的 BRCA 突变进行检测存在显著的实践差异。尽管随着时间的推移检测有所增加,但许多患者仍未接受检测,这表明错过了确定适合靶向治疗和遗传咨询的患者的机会。