Fieuws Charlotte, Van der Meulen Joni, Proesmans Kristiaan, De Jaeghere Emiel A, Loontiens Siebe, Van Dorpe Jo, Tummers Philippe, Denys Hannelore, Van de Vijver Koen, Claes Kathleen B M
Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar 22;8(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00565-2.
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, mainly due to late-stage diagnosis, frequent recurrences, and eventually therapy resistance. To identify potentially actionable genetic variants, sequencing data of 351 Belgian ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively captured from electronic health records. The cohort included 286 (81%) patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 17 (5%) with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, and 48 (14%) with other histotypes. Firstly, an overview of the prevalence and spectrum of the BRCA1/2 variants highlighted germline variants in 4% (11/250) and somatic variants in 11% (37/348) of patients. Secondly, application of a multi-gene panel in 168 tumors revealed a total of 214 variants in 28 genes beyond BRCA1/2 with a median of 1 (IQR, 1-2) genetic variant per patient. The ten most often altered genes were (in descending order): TP53, BRCA1, PIK3CA, BRCA2, KRAS, ERBB2 (HER2), TERT promotor, RB1, PIK3R1 and PTEN. Of note, the genetic landscape vastly differed between the studied histotypes. Finally, using ESCAT the clinical evidence of utility for every genetic variant was scored. Only BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were classified as tier-I. Nearly all patients (151/168; 90%) had an ESCAT tier-II variant, most frequently in TP53 (74%), PIK3CA (9%) and KRAS (7%). In conclusion, our findings imply that although only a small proportion of genetic variants currently have direct impact on ovarian cancer treatment decisions, other variants could help to identify novel (personalized) treatment options to address the poor prognosis of ovarian cancer, particularly in rare histotypes.
卵巢癌是最致命的妇科恶性肿瘤,主要原因是诊断时已处于晚期、频繁复发,最终产生治疗耐药性。为了识别具有潜在可操作的基因变异,我们从电子健康记录中回顾性获取了351例比利时卵巢癌患者的测序数据。该队列包括286例(81%)高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者、17例(5%)低级别浆液性卵巢癌患者和48例(14%)其他组织学类型的患者。首先,对BRCA1/2变异的患病率和谱进行概述,结果显示4%(11/250)的患者存在种系变异,11%(37/348)的患者存在体细胞变异。其次,在168个肿瘤中应用多基因检测板,结果显示除BRCA1/2外,28个基因共存在214个变异,每位患者的基因变异中位数为1个(四分位间距,1 - 2个)。最常发生改变的十个基因依次为(降序排列):TP53、BRCA1、PIK3CA、BRCA2、KRAS、ERBB2(HER2)、TERT启动子、RB1、PIK3R1和PTEN。值得注意的是,不同组织学类型的基因图谱差异很大。最后,使用ESCAT对每个基因变异的临床实用证据进行评分。只有BRCA1/2致病性变异被归类为I级。几乎所有患者(151/168;90%)都有ESCAT II级变异,最常见于TP53(74%)、PIK3CA(9%)和KRAS(7%)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,尽管目前只有一小部分基因变异对卵巢癌治疗决策有直接影响,但其他变异可能有助于识别新的(个性化)治疗方案,以改善卵巢癌的不良预后,尤其是在罕见组织学类型中。