• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公平分享就是关爱:儿童中期正义感与分配行为之间的联系。

Fair sharing is just caring: Links between justice sensitivity and distributive behavior in middle childhood.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, 10179 Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, 10179 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105561. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105561
PMID:36202013
Abstract

Justice sensitivity (JS), the tendency to perceive and adversely respond to injustice, was related to prosocial behavior in different age groups and to distributive preferences in adults. To test influences of JS on sharing and distributive preferences, middle childhood as an important phase for moral development may be particularly interesting. We asked 1320 5- to 12-year-old children (M = 8.05 years, SD = 1.02; 51.2 % girls, 1.3 % transgender and gender-nonconforming) to read five vignettes that made salient the different principles of distributive justice (equality, merit, and need) and to distribute imaginary sweets between themselves and one described child (sharing) or between two described children (distributing). Children also rated their JS, and parents rated children's theory of mind (ToM) abilities and empathy. More concerns for justice for the self (victim JS) predicted distributions following the merit principle and a preference for need over equality and merit when forced to choose among the three. Caring for justice for others (altruistic JS) predicted more sharing, equal distributions, less distributions according to the merit principle, and a preference for equal distributions over merit and need when forced to choose among the three. These associations prevailed when ToM and empathy were included as control variables. The findings underline the importance of justice-related personality traits, such as JS, for moral development in middle childhood.

摘要

正义感(JS)是指感知不公正并对此做出负面反应的倾向,它与不同年龄群体的亲社会行为以及成年人的分配偏好有关。为了检验 JS 对分享和分配偏好的影响,儿童中期作为道德发展的重要阶段可能特别有趣。我们要求 1320 名 5 至 12 岁的儿童(M=8.05 岁,SD=1.02;51.2%为女孩,1.3%为跨性别和非传统性别)阅读五个情景片段,这些片段突出了分配正义的不同原则(平等、功绩和需要),并在自己和一个描述的孩子(分享)或两个描述的孩子(分配)之间分配想象中的糖果。儿童还对自己的 JS 进行了评分,父母对孩子的心理理论(ToM)能力和同理心进行了评分。更多地关注自己的正义(受害者 JS)预测了根据功绩原则进行分配,以及在被迫从三个原则中进行选择时,优先考虑需要而不是平等和功绩。关心他人的正义(利他主义 JS)预测了更多的分享、平等分配、根据功绩原则分配较少,以及在被迫从三个原则中进行选择时,优先选择平等分配而不是功绩和需要。当将心理理论和同理心作为控制变量包括在内时,这些关联仍然存在。这些发现强调了正义感等与正义相关的人格特质对儿童中期道德发展的重要性。

相似文献

1
Fair sharing is just caring: Links between justice sensitivity and distributive behavior in middle childhood.公平分享就是关爱:儿童中期正义感与分配行为之间的联系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105561. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Links between justice sensitivity and moral reasoning, moral emotions, and moral identity in middle childhood.童年中期正义敏感度与道德推理、道德情感和道德认同之间的联系。
Child Dev. 2022 Mar;93(2):372-387. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13684. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
3
Justice Sensitivity in Middle Childhood: Measurement and Location in the Temperamental and Social Skills Space.儿童中期的公正敏感性:气质和社会技能空间中的测量和定位。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Jul-Aug;103(4):476-488. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1753754. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Children's reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development.儿童在成长过程中对分配正义和报应正义的推理。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Apr;52(4):613-28. doi: 10.1037/a0040069. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Justice Sensitivity in Middle Childhood: A Replication and Extension of Findings.童年中期的正义敏感性:研究结果的重复与扩展
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 25;11:610414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.610414. eCollection 2020.
6
The Development of a Preference for Procedural Justice for Self and Others.对自我和他人程序正义偏好的发展。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 10;8(1):17740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36072-1.
7
"But the poor needed it more": Children's judgments on procedural justice to allocate resources between two candidates equal in merit, different in need.“但穷人更需要它”:儿童对程序正义的判断,即在两名功绩相当但需求不同的候选人之间分配资源。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Aug;232:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105679. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
8
The moral, or the story? Changing children's distributive justice preferences through social communication.道德还是故事?通过社会交往改变儿童的分配公正偏好。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104441. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104441. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others.同理心与追求正义的动机:认知同理心和关切,但非情感同理心,能预测对他人遭受不公正对待的敏感度。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Afraid of injustice? Justice sensitivity is linked to general anxiety and social phobia symptoms.害怕不公正?正义感与一般焦虑和社交恐惧症症状有关。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.167. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Belief in a just world and fair behavior among clinical nurses: a moderated mediation model of empathy and observer justice sensitivity.临床护士对公正世界的信念与公平行为:共情与观察者公正敏感性的调节中介模型
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 15;23(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02140-3.
2
Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan.毕生发展中的宽恕观念。
Child Dev. 2024 Nov-Dec;95(6):1915-1933. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14122. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive.
人力资源管理实践的公平性:公正敏感者的评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1355378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355378. eCollection 2024.