Haines Victor Y, Patient David, Guerrero Sylvie
School of Industrial Relations, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vlerick Business School, Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1355378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355378. eCollection 2024.
Although fairness is a pervasive and ongoing concern in organizations, the fairness of human resource management practices is often overlooked. This study examines how individual differences in justice sensitivity influence the extent to which human resource management practices are perceived to convey principles of organizational justice.
Analysis was performed on a matching sample of 283 university students from three academic units in two countries having responded at two time points. Justice sensitivity was measured with the 40-item inventory developed and validated by Schmitt et al. (2010). Respondents were instructed to indicate to what extent each of 61 human resource management practices generally conveys principles of organizational justice.
Justice sensitivity was positively associated with subsequent assessments of the justice contents of human resource management practices. The distinction between self-oriented and other-oriented justice sensitivities was helpful in determining perceptions of these human resource management practices and of a subset of pay-for-performance practices.
The findings inform current research about the meanings borne by human resource management practices, and also increase understanding of entity judgment formation as an important aspect of systemic justice.
尽管公平是组织中普遍且持续受到关注的问题,但人力资源管理实践的公平性却常常被忽视。本研究考察了正义敏感性的个体差异如何影响人们对人力资源管理实践传达组织正义原则程度的认知。
对来自两个国家三个学术单位的283名大学生的匹配样本进行了分析,这些学生在两个时间点做出了回应。使用施密特等人(2010年)开发并验证的40项量表来测量正义敏感性。受访者被要求指出61项人力资源管理实践中的每一项在多大程度上普遍传达了组织正义原则。
正义敏感性与随后对人力资源管理实践的正义内容评估呈正相关。自我导向型和他人导向型正义敏感性之间的区别有助于确定对这些人力资源管理实践以及一部分绩效薪酬实践的认知。
这些发现为当前关于人力资源管理实践所承载意义的研究提供了信息,也增进了对作为系统正义重要方面的实体判断形成的理解。