Suppr超能文献

路易斯安那州新奥尔良市社区花园使用的促进因素和障碍:环境评估和定性分析。

Enablers and Barriers of Community Garden Use in New Orleans, Louisiana: An Environmental Assessment and Qualitative Analysis.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Bachelor of Science in Public Health (BSPH) Program, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 25812Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):356-365. doi: 10.1177/08901171221131710. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore factors associated with community garden use.

APPROACH

Environmental assessment of community gardens and semi-structured interviews.

SETTING

New Orleans, Louisiana.

PARTICIPANTS

10 community gardens (environmental assessment), 20 community members (including garden users and non-users) and garden administrators (qualitative interviews).

METHOD

Gardens were assessed based on (1) accessibility, (2) information, (3) design, (4) cleanliness, (5) walkability, (6) parking, and (7) noise. Semi-structured interviews took place over Zoom; transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Gardens assessed in the environmental assessment ranked high in design and cleanliness but low on accessibility and information availability. Salient themes from the qualitative interviews include and increased as enablers of community garden participation, with and as both potential enablers of, or barriers to, participation. Community members perceived that gardens could increase fresh food access, while administrators believed that it is not possible for community gardens to produce enough food to create community-wide impact, highlighting instead the importance of the social aspects of the garden as beneficial for health.

CONCLUSION

Community gardens should improve garden physical accessibility and information availability to incentivize use. Community gardens are valued as means for skill-building and social engagement. Future research should prioritize investigating the association between the social aspects of participating in community gardens and health outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨与社区花园使用相关的因素。

方法

对社区花园进行环境评估和半结构化访谈。

地点

路易斯安那州新奥尔良。

参与者

10 个社区花园(环境评估)、20 名社区成员(包括花园使用者和非使用者)和花园管理员(定性访谈)。

结果

在环境评估中,花园在设计和清洁度方面得分较高,但在可达性和信息可用性方面得分较低。定性访谈的主要主题包括增加和增加是社区花园参与的促进因素,而和则既是参与的潜在促进因素,也是参与的障碍。社区成员认为花园可以增加新鲜食物的获取,而管理员则认为社区花园不可能生产足够的食物来产生社区范围内的影响,反而强调花园的社会方面对健康有益。

结论

社区花园应改善花园的物理可达性和信息可用性,以激励使用。社区花园被视为技能培养和社交参与的手段。未来的研究应优先调查参与社区花园的社会方面与健康结果之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Enablers and Barriers of Community Garden Use in New Orleans, Louisiana: An Environmental Assessment and Qualitative Analysis.
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):356-365. doi: 10.1177/08901171221131710. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Mixed-Methods Implementation Study of a Home Garden Intervention in Rural Guatemala Using the RE-AIM Framework.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jul;122(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Community gardens and urban agriculture: Healthy environment/healthy citizens.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Dec;32(6):1452-1461. doi: 10.1111/inm.13149. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Process Evaluation of a Community Garden at an Urban Outpatient Clinic.
J Community Health. 2017 Aug;42(4):639-648. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0299-y.
7
"We need our own food, to grow our own veggies…" Remote Aboriginal food gardens in the Top End of Australia's Northern Territory.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013 Oct;37(5):434-41. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12103. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Perceptions of School-Based Kitchen Garden Programs in Low-Income, African American Communities.
Health Promot Pract. 2019 Sep;20(5):667-674. doi: 10.1177/1524839918782157. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Perceived Benefits of Participation and Risks of Soil Contamination in St. Louis Urban Community Gardens.
J Community Health. 2018 Jun;43(3):604-610. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0459-8.
10
Community Gardens: A Catalyst for Community Change.
Health Promot Pract. 2023 May;24(1_suppl):92S-107S. doi: 10.1177/15248399221120808.

本文引用的文献

1
Framing Food Access: Do Community Gardens Inadvertently Reproduce Inequality?
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Apr;48(2):160-168. doi: 10.1177/1090198120950617. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
(I Can't Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0181689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181689. eCollection 2017.
4
Community Gardens as Environmental Health Interventions: Benefits Versus Potential Risks.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):252-265. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0133-4.
5
The development of a model of community garden benefits to wellbeing.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 21;3:348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.005. eCollection 2016 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验