• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶髂关节融合术——向变体解剖结构的转变及临床意义。

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion-A Shift Toward Variant Anatomy and Clinical Implications.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:e460-e470. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.001
PMID:36202341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate impact of patient factors and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) anatomical structure on SIJ fusion outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study evaluated patients diagnosed with SIJ dysfunction refractory to conservative measures who had available preoperative imaging of the sacrum and underwent SIJ fusion surgery. The impact of patient sociodemographics on pain improvement was assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in patient sociodemographics and outcome information between anatomical subtypes were assessed with χ and Kruskal-Wallis tests. χ test was used to compare joint anatomy distribution between studies analyzing SIJ variations.

RESULTS

We included 77 total joints that underwent instrumentation. There were significant differences between the anatomical subtypes with female sex having significantly higher rates of non-normal joint anatomy. Younger age was significantly more common in bipartite/dysmorphic anatomy (53.9 years) than normal anatomy (70 years) (P < 0.05). There was a trend toward better outcomes in bipartite/dysmorphic and accessory variants, while semicircular defect and crescent variants trended toward worse outcomes. Nonnormal anatomy was significantly more frequent in our population than previous reports on nonpathological SIJ.

CONCLUSIONS

A pathological SIJ has a significantly higher prevalence of variant joint anatomy. There appears to be a trend toward differences in surgical outcomes based on SIJ anatomy. Future research with larger sample sizes is necessary to confirm these differences.

摘要

目的

探讨患者因素和骶髂关节(SIJ)解剖结构对 SIJ 融合结果的影响。

方法

本单中心回顾性观察性研究评估了诊断为对保守措施无反应的 SIJ 功能障碍且有骶骨术前影像学资料并接受 SIJ 融合手术的患者。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估患者社会人口统计学因素对疼痛改善的影响。采用 χ 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验评估不同解剖亚型之间患者社会人口统计学和结果信息的差异。 χ 检验用于比较分析 SIJ 变异的研究中关节解剖分布。

结果

我们共纳入了 77 个接受器械治疗的关节。解剖亚型之间存在显著差异,女性的非正常关节解剖结构发生率明显更高。二分体/畸形解剖(53.9 岁)比正常解剖(70 岁)更常见年轻年龄(P < 0.05)。二分体/畸形和副变体的结果更好,而半圆形缺陷和新月形变体的结果更差。与之前关于非病理性 SIJ 的报告相比,我们人群中的非正常解剖结构更为常见。

结论

病理性 SIJ 中变异关节解剖结构的患病率明显更高。似乎基于 SIJ 解剖结构的手术结果存在差异趋势。需要更大样本量的未来研究来证实这些差异。

相似文献

1
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion-A Shift Toward Variant Anatomy and Clinical Implications.骶髂关节融合术——向变体解剖结构的转变及临床意义。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:e460-e470. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
2
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验:12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
4
Frequency of anatomical variation of the sacroiliac joint in asymptomatic young adults and its relationship with sacroiliac joint degeneration.无症状年轻成年人骶髂关节解剖变异的频率及其与骶髂关节退变的关系。
Clin Anat. 2020 Sep;33(6):839-843. doi: 10.1002/ca.23539. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
6
Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery-A Comparative Study of the Number of Fused Segments and Sacral Fusion.腰椎或腰骶融合术后的骶髂关节退变——融合节段数与骶骨融合的比较研究。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;190:e823-e832. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.腰椎或腰骶椎融合内固定术后骶髂关节退变:一项为期五年随访的前瞻性队列研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1192-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35.
8
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.微创骶髂关节融合术、射频神经消融术与保守治疗对骶髂关节痛的 6 年对比性病例系列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;82(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185.
9
Impact of diagnosis and type of sacroiliac joint fusion on postoperative complications.骶髂关节融合术的诊断及类型对术后并发症的影响
Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07031-8. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
10
Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的双中心观察性研究:一年结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 28;17(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03466-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior allograft sacroiliac joint fusion with pre-operative mapping.术前定位的同种异体骨后入路骶髂关节融合术
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Apr 4;4(2):100581. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100581. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.