Chapman Carolyn Riley, Belli Hayley M, Leach Danielle, Shah Lesha D, Bateman-House Alison
Department of Population Health, Division of Medical Ethics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Population Health, Division of Biostatistics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Med Access Point Care. 2021 Apr 19;5:23992026211005991. doi: 10.1177/23992026211005991. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Physicians in the United States play an essential role guiding patients through single patient pre-approval access (PAA) to investigational medical products via either the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Expanded Access (EA) or the federal Right To Try (RTT) pathways. In this study, we sought to better understand pediatric hematologist/oncologists' attitudes about seeking PAA, on behalf of single patients, to investigational drugs outside of clinical trials.
A cross-sectional survey was developed and sent to pediatric hematologist/oncologists via St. Baldrick's Foundation's email distribution list.
Of 73 respondents (10.1% of those who received the survey), 56 met eligibility criteria and are included in the analysis. Over 80% ( = 46) had prior experience with single patient PAA. Respondents were most concerned about the unknown risks and benefits of investigational drugs and financial implications of PAA for patients. One hundred percent and 91.1% of respondents indicated a willingness to support patients through EA and RTT pathways, respectively. When asked about their most recent experience with PAA, 40 out of 46 indicated that they used the FDA's EA pathway to seek PAA and 4 out of 46 indicated that they used the RTT pathway. Of 44 respondents who had used the EA or RTT pathway, 43 indicated that the biotechnology or pharmaceutical company they solicited granted access to the requested product.
Survey results support other findings suggesting a need for additional physician support and education about PAA and that physicians may have unequal access to information about investigational drugs and concerns about financial implications of PAA for their patients.
美国的医生在指导患者通过食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的扩大准入(EA)或联邦“尝试权”(RTT)途径,获得用于单例患者的研究性医疗产品的预先批准准入(PAA)方面发挥着重要作用。在本研究中,我们试图更好地了解儿科血液科医生/肿瘤学家对于代表单例患者寻求临床试验之外的研究性药物PAA的态度。
开展了一项横断面调查,并通过圣巴德里克基金会的电子邮件分发列表发送给儿科血液科医生/肿瘤学家。
在73名受访者中(占收到调查问卷者的10.1%),56人符合资格标准并纳入分析。超过80%(n = 46)的人有过单例患者PAA的经验。受访者最担心研究性药物的未知风险和益处以及PAA对患者的财务影响。100%和91.1%的受访者分别表示愿意通过EA和RTT途径支持患者。当被问及他们最近一次PAA的经历时,46人中有40人表示他们使用FDA的EA途径寻求PAA,46人中有4人表示他们使用RTT途径。在44名使用过EA或RTT途径的受访者中,43人表示他们所请求的生物技术或制药公司批准了对所请求产品的准入。
调查结果支持了其他研究结果,表明需要为医生提供更多关于PAA的支持和教育,并且医生在获取研究性药物信息方面可能存在不平等,同时担心PAA对其患者的财务影响。