• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大准入和尝试权请求:社区肿瘤医生的经验。

Expanded Access and Right To Try Requests: The Community Oncologist's Experience.

机构信息

Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1719-e1727. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00569. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1200/OP.20.00569
PMID:33886355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8600511/
Abstract

PURPOSE

For patients with cancer who have exhausted approved treatment options and for whom appropriate clinical trials are not available, access to investigational drugs through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access (EA) program has been an alternative since the program's inception more than 30 years ago. In 2018, federal Right To Try legislation was passed in the United States, creating a second pathway-one that bypasses the US Food and Drug Administration-to obtain unapproved drugs outside of clinical trials. The use of the two programs by community medical oncologists and hematologist-oncologists has not been studied.

METHODS

Between October 2019 and February 2020, community oncologists-hematologists from across the United States completed web-based surveys about EA and Right To Try pathways for accessing unapproved drugs for their patients. Physicians were asked about their utilization of, and perceptions of, the two programs.

RESULTS

Of the 238 physicians who completed the survey, 46% indicated that they had attempted to gain access to an investigational drug for a patient using the EA program, whereas 14% reported attempting to use Right To Try pathway to obtain an unapproved drug for a patient. Eighty-nine percent of those who tried to use the EA program reported success in obtaining the investigational drug versus 73% of those who attempted to use the Right To Try pathway.

CONCLUSION

Our survey found that most community oncologists-hematologists were aware of both the EA and Right To Try pathways, but there is room for improvement in understanding and utilization of the programs.

摘要

目的

对于已用尽批准治疗方案且无合适临床试验可供选择的癌症患者,自 30 多年前该项目启动以来,通过美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)扩大准入(Expanded Access,EA)计划获得试验性药物是一种替代方案。2018 年,美国通过了联邦“尝试权”立法,创建了第二条途径——绕过 FDA,在临床试验之外获得未经批准的药物。目前尚未研究社区肿瘤学家和血液科肿瘤学家对这两个项目的使用情况。

方法

2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月,来自美国各地的社区肿瘤学家-血液科医生通过网络调查,了解他们在为患者使用 EA 和“尝试权”途径获取未经批准药物方面的情况。医生们被问及他们对这两个项目的使用情况和看法。

结果

在完成调查的 238 名医生中,46%的人表示他们曾试图通过 EA 项目为患者获得试验性药物,而 14%的人表示曾试图通过“尝试权”途径获得未经批准的药物。89%试图使用 EA 项目的人报告成功获得了研究药物,而试图使用“尝试权”途径的人中有 73%报告成功。

结论

我们的调查发现,大多数社区肿瘤学家-血液科医生都了解 EA 和“尝试权”途径,但在理解和使用这些途径方面仍有改进的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f83b/8600511/5dd106d9cff0/op-17-e1719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f83b/8600511/6af383207b4f/op-17-e1719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f83b/8600511/5dd106d9cff0/op-17-e1719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f83b/8600511/6af383207b4f/op-17-e1719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f83b/8600511/5dd106d9cff0/op-17-e1719-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanded Access and Right To Try Requests: The Community Oncologist's Experience.扩大准入和尝试权请求:社区肿瘤医生的经验。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1719-e1727. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00569. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Access to Investigational Drugs: FDA Expanded Access Programs or "Right-to-Try" Legislation?获取试验用药物:美国食品药品监督管理局的扩大获取项目还是“尝试权”立法?
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):526-32. doi: 10.1111/cts.12255. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
3
Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.通过美国食品和药物管理局扩大准入和同情用药计划获得研究药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0283.
4
"I Think It's Been Met With a Shrug:" Oncologists' Views Toward and Experiences With Right-to-Try.“我认为这已经被忽视了”:肿瘤学家对尝试权的看法和经验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):735-741. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa137.
5
Oncologists' reflections on patient rights and access to compassionate use drugs: A qualitative interview study from an academic cancer center.肿瘤学家对患者权利和获得同情用药的思考:来自学术癌症中心的定性访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 17;16(12):e0261478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261478. eCollection 2021.
6
Perspectives of Academic Oncologists About Offering Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs.学术肿瘤学家对提供扩展获得研究性药物的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39766.
7
A survey of pediatric hematologists/oncologists' perspectives on single patient Expanded Access and Right to Try.一项关于儿科血液科医生/肿瘤医生对单患者扩大使用及“尝试权”观点的调查。
Med Access Point Care. 2021 Apr 19;5:23992026211005991. doi: 10.1177/23992026211005991. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Single-Patient Expanded Access Requests: IRB Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives.单病例扩大使用申请:机构审查委员会专业人员的经验与观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):88-99. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577192. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
Oversight of Right-to-Try and Expanded Access Requests for Off-Trial Access to Investigational Drugs.对试验性药物非试验性使用的“尝试权”及扩大使用申请的监督。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Jan;42(1):2-13. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500038.
10
Single-patient expanded access: A primer for pharmacists.单患者扩展准入:药剂师入门指南。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Nov 22;79(23):2118-2127. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac242.

引用本文的文献

1
Taking AIM at serious illness: implementing an access to investigational medicines expanded access program.瞄准重症:实施一项试验用药物扩大可及性项目
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 9;10:1287449. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1287449. eCollection 2023.
2
Perspectives of Academic Oncologists About Offering Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs.学术肿瘤学家对提供扩展获得研究性药物的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39766.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical concerns regarding private equity in Right to Try in the USA.美国“尝试权”中有关私募股权的伦理问题。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1260-1262. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30469-1.
2
"I Think It's Been Met With a Shrug:" Oncologists' Views Toward and Experiences With Right-to-Try.“我认为这已经被忽视了”:肿瘤学家对尝试权的看法和经验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):735-741. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa137.
3
Promoting Patient Interests in Implementing the Federal Right to Try Act.在实施《联邦试用权法案》中促进患者利益
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):869-870. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9880.
4
A Pilot Experiment in Responding to Individual Patient Requests for Compassionate Use of an Unapproved Drug: The Compassionate Use Advisory Committee (CompAC).一项针对患者个人请求使用未批准药物的同情用药进行回应的试点实验:同情用药咨询委员会(CompAC)。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Mar;53(2):243-248. doi: 10.1177/2168479018759659. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters.临床试验成功率及相关参数的估计。
Biostatistics. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):273-286. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069.
6
The Federal Right to Try Act of 2017-A Wrong Turn for Access to Investigational Drugs and the Path Forward.2017年《联邦试用权法案》——获取研究性药物的错误转向及未来之路。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):321-322. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8167.
7
Federal Right-to-Try Legislation - Threatening the FDA's Public Health Mission.联邦“试用权”立法——对美国食品药品监督管理局公共卫生使命的威胁。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):695-697. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714054. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
8
How Often Are Drugs Made Available Under the Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access Process Approved?通过美国食品药品监督管理局扩大获取程序提供的药物获批频率如何?
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;57 Suppl 10:S136-S142. doi: 10.1002/jcph.960.
9
Overview of FDA's Expanded Access Program for Investigational Drugs.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)研究性药物扩大使用项目概述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar 1;51(2):177-179. doi: 10.1177/2168479017694850.
10
Finding the Evidence in Real-World Evidence: Moving from Data to Information to Knowledge.在真实世界证据中寻找证据:从数据到信息再到知识的转变。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jan;224(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 28.