• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“居家安全计划”对安置及永久性结果的影响:一项准实验研究的结果

Impact of Safe@Home on Placement and Permanency Outcomes: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study.

作者信息

Reyes Lucia Miranda, Kaye Sarah

机构信息

Kaye Implementation & Evaluation LLC, Tacoma, WA, USA.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2024 Feb;29(1):202-213. doi: 10.1177/10775595221132220. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1177/10775595221132220
PMID:36206539
Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of Safe@Home, an in-home intervention to (1) prevent out-of-home placement for children at imminent risk of placement, and (2) minimize time in out-of-home care for children already in foster care. Using Coarsened Exact Matching, children who received Safe@Home were matched to a comparison group of children served before Safe@Home was available in their community. All children were determined by the child welfare agency to be unsafe and in need of immediate intervention. The matched samples (Safe@Home = 510, Comparison = 851) showed strong baseline equivalence on child age, race/ethnicity, previous history of child welfare involvement, and safety threats. Children who received Safe@Home experienced lower rate of out-of-home placements, higher rate of permanency with a parent (sustained for 12 months after the end of Safe@Home), fewer days in out-of-home care, and shorter time to case closure relative to children who received treatment as usual. There was no effect of Safe@Home on post-permanency outcomes of maltreatment and entry or re-entry after case closure.

摘要

本研究评估了“居家安全”项目的有效性,这是一项居家干预措施,旨在:(1)防止即将被安置的儿童被安置到家庭以外的地方;(2)尽量减少已进入寄养照料的儿童在家庭以外照料机构的时间。利用精确匹配法,将接受“居家安全”项目的儿童与在其社区尚未实施该项目之前接受服务的儿童组成的对照组进行匹配。所有儿童均由儿童福利机构判定为处于不安全状态且需要立即进行干预。匹配样本(“居家安全”项目组 = 510名,对照组 = 851名)在儿童年龄、种族/族裔、之前参与儿童福利事务的历史以及安全威胁方面显示出很强的基线等效性。与接受常规治疗的儿童相比,接受“居家安全”项目的儿童被安置到家庭以外的比例更低,与父母团聚的比例更高(在“居家安全”项目结束后持续12个月),在家庭以外照料机构的天数更少,结案时间更短。“居家安全”项目对虐待行为的永久性后果以及结案后再次进入或重新进入照料机构没有影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Safe@Home on Placement and Permanency Outcomes: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study.“居家安全计划”对安置及永久性结果的影响:一项准实验研究的结果
Child Maltreat. 2024 Feb;29(1):202-213. doi: 10.1177/10775595221132220. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属照顾,旨在保障因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置及福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub3.
3
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属抚养是为了那些因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置和福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub2.
4
SAFE Homes: is it worth the cost? An evaluation of a group home permanency planning program for children who first enter out-of-home care.安全之家:是否物有所值?对首次进入家庭外照料的儿童的集体家庭永久性安置计划的评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Jun;29(6):627-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.007.
5
The impact of a statewide trauma-informed child welfare initiative on children's permanency and maltreatment outcomes.全州范围创伤知情型儿童福利倡议对儿童安置和虐待问题结果的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Jul;81:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 May 5.
6
Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse.增强儿童和家庭永久性(EPIC):针对父母药物滥用的儿童福利干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10668-1.
7
National training and development curriculum training program impact on placement, permanency, and stability.国家级培训和发展课程培训计划对安置、永久性和稳定性的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106712. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
8
Placement Stability, Cumulative Time in Care, and Permanency: Using Administrative Data from CPS to Track Placement Trajectories.安置稳定性、累计照料时间和永久性:利用 CPS 的行政数据跟踪安置轨迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111405.
9
Rethinking Child Welfare to Keep Families Safe and Together: Effective Housing-Based Supports to Reduce Child Trauma, Maltreatment Recidivism, and Re-Entry to Foster Care.重新思考儿童福利以保障家庭安全与团聚:基于住房的有效支持措施,以减少儿童创伤、虐待再犯及重新进入寄养照料系统的情况。
Child Welfare. 2015;94(4):185-204.
10
Maltreatment following reunification: predictors of subsequent Child Protective Services contact after children return home.团聚后的虐待:儿童回家后后续儿童保护服务接触的预测因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Apr;33(4):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.005. Epub 2009 Mar 26.