Postgraduate Program in Fundamental Nursing, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Universidade de São Paulo, Bairro Quinta da Primavera, Avenida Luiz Octávio da Silva Whitaker 1550, Comp. 2303, Ribeirão Preto, SP CEP 14022-098, Brazil.
Paraná Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Federal Institute of Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Sep-Oct;26(5):100443. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100443. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
Educational programs designed for specific populations to improve regular physical activity need to be tested.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program, when compared to usual care, on improving physical activity 5 to 7 months after hospital discharge in adult patients undergoing their first percutaneous coronary intervention.
Randomized controlled trial with two groups: usual care (n = 56) and educational program (n = 53) interventions. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected and the Baecke-Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire, Self-efficacy Scale for Physical Activity, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were administered at baseline and follow-up. Participants in the educational program received an intervention based on Social Cognitive Theory, focused on physical activity, followed by three telephone calls. The usual care group received the hospital routine information. Unadjusted and adjusted differences between the two groups in mean score changes (with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were calculated for all outcomes.
At follow-up, the educational program group showed higher mean ± standard deviation scores than the usual care group for practice of physical activity (7.94 ± 1.84 vs. 6.90 ± 1.89) and for self-efficacy (3.98 ± 3.75 vs. 2.52 ± 3.12). Adjusting for baseline outcome, the difference in mean change between groups was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.46) for physical activity and 2.30 (95% CI: 1.12, 3.49) for self-efficacy. There were no statistical differences between groups in symptoms of anxiety and depression.
The educational program may be an effective intervention in increasing habitual physical activity and self-efficacy for physical activity in individuals with coronary artery disease.
为提高特定人群的常规体力活动而设计的教育计划需要进行测试。
评估教育计划与常规护理相比,在改善首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 至 7 个月成人患者体力活动方面的有效性。
这是一项随机对照试验,分为两组:常规护理组(n=56)和教育计划组(n=53)。收集社会人口统计学和临床特征数据,并在基线和随访时使用 Baecke 习惯性体力活动问卷、体力活动自我效能量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表进行评估。教育计划组接受基于社会认知理论的干预,重点是体力活动,随后进行三次电话随访。常规护理组接受医院常规信息。计算所有结局的未调整和调整后两组间平均得分变化(95%置信区间 [CI])的差异。
随访时,教育计划组的体力活动实践(7.94±1.84 比 6.90±1.89)和自我效能(3.98±3.75 比 2.52±3.12)的平均得分高于常规护理组。调整基线结局后,两组间平均变化差异为 0.89(95%CI:0.32,1.46)的体力活动和 2.30(95%CI:1.12,3.49)的自我效能。两组间焦虑和抑郁症状无统计学差异。
教育计划可能是一种有效的干预措施,可增加冠心病患者的习惯性体力活动和体力活动自我效能。