Suppr超能文献

针对儿童和青少年焦虑障碍治疗的随机对照试验中报告的结局和结局测量工具:范围综述方案。

Outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported in randomised controlled trials of anxiety disorder treatments in children and adolescents: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Neurosciences and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e063404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063404.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric anxiety disorders (AD) are prevalent and persistent mental health conditions worldwide affecting between 10% and 20% of children and adolescents. Despite the high prevalence of paediatric AD, there is limited understanding of which treatments work best. Outcome heterogeneity across paediatric mental health trials has been a significant factor in hindering the ability to compare results and assess the efficacy of such trials. This scoping review will help to identify and synthesise the outcomes reported in paediatric AD trials to date.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, a comprehensive electronic bibliographic database search (MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL) strategy will be applied to identify articles examining interventions for children diagnosed with an AD. Articles will be eligible for inclusion if they assess at least one AD intervention (eg, psychological), in children 4-18 years of age inclusive. Initial title and abstract screening will be completed by two trained reviewers independently and in duplicate. Full-text screening of each included article will be completed independently and in duplicate by two of three trained reviewers. Identified outcomes will be mapped to a standard outcome taxonomy developed for core outcome sets. Trial and outcome characteristics will be synthesised using quantitative metrics (counts and frequencies).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this is a scoping review of the literature and patient information or records were not accessed, institutional ethics approval was not required. Results of this scoping review will be disseminated to clinicians, researchers inclusive of trialists and other stakeholders invested in outcome selection, measurement and reporting in paediatric AD trials. In addition, scoping review results will inform the development of a Core Outcome Set for paediatric AD trials-a minimum set of outcomes that should be measured across trials in an area of health, without precluding the inclusion of other outcomes.

摘要

介绍

儿科焦虑症(AD)是一种普遍存在且持续存在的精神健康状况,在全球范围内影响着 10%至 20%的儿童和青少年。尽管儿科 AD 的患病率很高,但对于哪种治疗方法最有效,人们的了解有限。儿科心理健康试验的结果异质性一直是阻碍比较结果和评估此类试验疗效的一个重要因素。这项范围界定审查将有助于确定和综合迄今为止儿科 AD 试验报告的结果。

方法和分析

根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围界定审查方法,将应用全面的电子文献数据库搜索(MEDLINE、APA PsycINFO、Embase、CINAHL)策略,以确定研究儿童 AD 干预措施的文章。如果文章评估了至少一种 AD 干预措施(例如,心理干预),且纳入年龄在 4-18 岁之间的儿童,则该文章将有资格被纳入。两名经过培训的评审员将独立并重复进行初始标题和摘要筛选。每个纳入文章的全文筛选将由三名训练有素的评审员中的两名独立并重复进行。确定的结果将映射到为核心结果集开发的标准结果分类法。将使用定量指标(计数和频率)对试验和结果特征进行综合。

伦理和传播

由于这是对文献的范围界定审查,且未查阅患者信息或记录,因此不需要机构伦理批准。该范围界定审查的结果将传播给临床医生、研究人员,包括试验者和其他对儿科 AD 试验中结局选择、测量和报告感兴趣的利益相关者。此外,范围界定审查的结果将为儿科 AD 试验制定核心结局集提供信息——这是健康领域内每个试验都应测量的一组最小结局,而不会排除纳入其他结局。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年焦虑症的认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 16;11(11):CD013162. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验