Medical College of Nanchang University, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Jiangxi Cardiovascular Research Institute, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi Provincial, China.
Lipids Health Dis. 2022 Oct 7;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z.
Traditional and non-traditional (TNNT) lipid indicators are known to be closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study's objective was to compare the degree of associations and diagnostic values of TNNT lipid indicators with NAFLD.
Participants were 14,251 Japanese adults who undergoing health checkups, and we measured and calculated 11 lipid indicators, including traditional lipid indicators such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG), as well as non-traditional lipid indicators such as TC/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TG/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol (RC), RC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio. The associations between these lipid indicators and NAFLD were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the performance of these lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
After rigorous adjustment for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regression showed that all TNNT lipid indicators were independently associated with NAFLD, among which the RC/HDL-C ratio and RC had the strongest association with NAFLD. ROC analysis showed that non-traditional lipid indicators were superior to traditional lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD, especially in young adults and females. It is worth mentioning that the RC/HDL-C ratio was the best lipid indicator for identifying NAFLD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.43; in addition, TG/HDL-C ratio also had a high recognition performance for NAFLD.
Overall, in the Japanese population, non-traditional lipid indicators had a higher diagnostic value for NAFLD compared to traditional lipid indicators, and lipid indicators alone had a lower diagnostic value for NAFLD than the ratio of two lipid indicators, with RC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C being the best lipid indicators for identifying NAFLD.
传统和非传统(TNNT)脂质指标与非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)密切相关。本研究旨在比较 TNNT 脂质指标与 NAFLD 的关联程度和诊断价值。
参与者为 14251 名日本成年人,他们接受了健康检查,我们测量和计算了 11 种脂质指标,包括高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和甘油三酯(TG)等传统脂质指标,以及 TC/HDL-C 比值、LDL-C/HDL-C 比值、TG/HDL-C 比值、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)、残余胆固醇(RC)、RC/HDL-C 比值和 non-HDL-C/HDL-C 比值等非传统脂质指标。使用多变量逻辑回归评估这些脂质指标与 NAFLD 的相关性,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析这些脂质指标识别 NAFLD 的性能。
经过潜在混杂因素的严格调整,多变量逻辑回归显示,所有 TNNT 脂质指标均与 NAFLD 独立相关,其中 RC/HDL-C 比值和 RC 与 NAFLD 的相关性最强。ROC 分析显示,非传统脂质指标在识别 NAFLD 方面优于传统脂质指标,尤其是在年轻成年人和女性中。值得注意的是,RC/HDL-C 比值是识别 NAFLD 的最佳脂质指标,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.82,最佳截断值为 0.43;此外,TG/HDL-C 比值对 NAFLD 也有较高的识别性能。
总的来说,在日本人群中,与传统脂质指标相比,非传统脂质指标对 NAFLD 的诊断价值更高,单独的脂质指标对 NAFLD 的诊断价值低于两种脂质指标的比值,RC/HDL-C 和 TG/HDL-C 是识别 NAFLD 的最佳脂质指标。