Suppr超能文献

使用振荡壳聚糖刷或钛刮匙治疗轻中度种植体周围炎的非手术治疗:一项随机多中心对照临床试验。

Non-surgical treatment of mild to moderate peri-implantitis using an oscillating chitosan brush or a titanium curette-A randomized multicentre controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetics and Oral Function, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Dec;33(12):1254-1264. doi: 10.1111/clr.14007. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, parallel-group, examiner-blinded, multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial aimed to assess the efficacy of an oscillating chitosan brush (OCB) versus titanium curettes (TC) on clinical parameters in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In five dental specialist clinics, 39 patients with one implant with mild to moderate peri-implantitis, defined as 2-4 mm radiographic reduced bone level, bleeding index (BI) ≥ 2, and probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm were randomly allocated to test and control groups, receiving OCB or TC debridement, respectively. Treatment was performed at baseline and three months. PPD, BI, and Plaque index (PI) were measured at six sites per implant and recorded by five blinded examiners at baseline, one, three, and six month(s). Pus was recorded as present/not present. Changes in PPD and BI were compared between groups and analysed using multilevel partial ordinal and linear regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients completed the study. Both groups showed significant reductions in PPD and BI at six months compared with baseline (p < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in PPD and BI changes between the groups. Eradication of peri-implant disease as defined was observed in 9.5% of cases in the OCB group and 5.9% in the TC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this six-month multicentre clinical trial, non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with OCB and TC showed no difference between the interventions. Eradication of disease was not predictable for any of the groups.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性、平行组、 examiner-blinded、多中心、随机、对照临床试验旨在评估振荡壳聚糖刷(OCB)与钛刮匙(TC)在非手术治疗种植体周围炎的临床参数方面的疗效。

材料和方法

在五家牙科专科诊所,将 39 名患有轻度至中度种植体周围炎的患者(定义为 2-4mm 放射状骨水平降低、BI≥2、PPD≥4mm)随机分配到试验组和对照组,分别接受 OCB 或 TC 清创术。治疗在基线和三个月时进行。PPD、BI 和菌斑指数(PI)在每个种植体的六个部位进行测量,并由五名盲检员在基线、一个月、三个月和六个月时进行记录。脓液记录为存在/不存在。采用多级部分有序和线性回归分析比较两组之间 PPD 和 BI 的变化。

结果

38 名患者完成了研究。与基线相比,两组在六个月时 PPD 和 BI 均显著降低(p<0.05)。两组之间 PPD 和 BI 变化无统计学差异。OCB 组和 TC 组中,定义的种植体周围疾病的根除率分别为 9.5%和 5.9%。

结论

在这项为期六个月的多中心临床试验的限制范围内,OCB 和 TC 对种植体周围炎的非手术治疗在干预措施之间没有差异。任何一组都无法预测疾病的根除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293e/10092542/b875627cd420/CLR-33-1254-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验