Bishop Justin A, Thompson Lester D R, Siegele Bradford, Gagan Jeffrey, Mansour Mena, Chernock Rebecca D, Rooper Lisa M
Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Head and Neck Pathology Consultations, Woodland Hills, CA, USA.
Histopathology. 2023 Jan;82(2):305-313. doi: 10.1111/his.14817. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is historically defined by a mix of squamoid, intermediate, and mucous cells, but we have recently encountered several cases lacking immunoreactivity for squamous markers p40, p63, and CK5/6 despite MAML2 fusions. This study will characterise these unique tumours. Ten MEC were collected arising from the parotid gland (n = 4), submandibular gland (n = 2), nasopharynx (n = 1), base of tongue (n = 1), bronchus (n = 1), and trachea (n = 1). Six tumours were low-grade, two intermediate-grade, one high-grade, and one demonstrated low-grade areas with high-grade transformation. Four cases were oncocytic, four had clear-cell features, two had spindle cell features, and one high-grade MEC had prominent solid, cord-like, and micropapillary features. The tumours were negative for p40 (10/10), p63 (10/10), and CK5/6 (9/9). Targeted RNA sequencing demonstrated CRTC1::MAML2 in five cases, CRTC3::MAML2 in two, and a novel MAML2::CEP126 in the unusual high-grade case. In two cases with insufficient RNA, MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) showed rearrangement. Genetically-confirmed MEC may lack overt squamous differentiation by histology and immunohistochemistry. While most cases harboured canonical fusions and fit within the spectra of MEC variants with oncocytic, clear cell, and/or spindle cell features, one had a novel MAML2::CEP126 fusion and unusual morphology. In MEC without squamoid cells, the use of immunohistochemistry may hinder, rather than aid, the correct diagnosis. In such cases, MAML2 analysis is most useful. The historical definition of MEC as a carcinoma with squamoid, intermediate and mucous cells should be revisited.
黏液表皮样癌(MEC)在历史上是根据鳞状细胞、中间细胞和黏液细胞的混合来定义的,但我们最近遇到了几例尽管存在MAML2融合但对鳞状标志物p40、p63和CK5/6缺乏免疫反应性的病例。本研究将对这些独特的肿瘤进行特征描述。收集了10例MEC,分别起源于腮腺(n = 4)、下颌下腺(n = 2)、鼻咽(n = 1)、舌根(n = 1)、支气管(n = 1)和气管(n = 1)。6例为低级别,2例为中级别,1例为高级别,1例表现为低级别区域伴有高级别转化。4例为嗜酸性细胞型,4例具有透明细胞特征,2例具有梭形细胞特征,1例高级别MEC具有显著的实性、条索状和微乳头特征。这些肿瘤对p40(10/10)、p63(10/10)和CK5/6(9/9)均为阴性。靶向RNA测序显示5例为CRTC1::MAML2,2例为CRTC3::MAML2,在这例不寻常的高级别病例中为一种新的MAML2::CEP126。在2例RNA不足的病例中,MAML2荧光原位杂交(FISH)显示重排。经基因确认的MEC在组织学和免疫组化上可能缺乏明显的鳞状分化。虽然大多数病例具有典型融合且符合具有嗜酸性细胞、透明细胞和/或梭形细胞特征的MEC变体谱,但有1例具有新的MAML2::CEP126融合和不寻常的形态。在没有鳞状细胞的MEC中,免疫组化的使用可能会阻碍而不是有助于正确诊断。在这种情况下,MAML2分析最有用。黏液表皮样癌作为一种具有鳞状、中间和黏液细胞的癌的历史定义应重新审视。