Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助检测与传统结肠镜检查对近端结肠病变的诊断:一项多中心、随机、串联结肠镜检查研究。

Computer-assisted detection versus conventional colonoscopy for proximal colonic lesions: a multicenter, randomized, tandem-colonoscopy study.

作者信息

Lui Thomas K L, Hang Dao Viet, Tsao Stephen K K, Hui Cynthia K Y, Mak Loey Lung Yi, Ko Michael K L, Cheung Ka Shing, Thian M Y, Liang R, Tsui Vivien W M, Yeung Chung Kwong, Dao L V, Leung Wai K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Internal Medicine Faculty, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Feb;97(2):325-334.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.020. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Computer-assisted detection (CADe) is a promising technologic advance that enhances adenoma detection during colonoscopy. However, the role of CADe in reducing missed colonic lesions is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the miss rates of proximal colonic lesions by CADe and conventional colonoscopy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, tandem-colonoscopy study conducted in 3 Asian centers. Patients were randomized to receive CADe or conventional white-light colonoscopy during the first withdrawal of the proximal colon (cecum to splenic flexure), immediately followed by tandem examination of the proximal colon with white light in both groups. The primary outcome was adenoma/polyp miss rate, which was defined as any adenoma/polyp detected during the second examination.

RESULTS

Of 223 patients (48.6% men; median age, 63 years) enrolled, 7 patients did not have tandem examination, leaving 108 patients in each group. There was no difference in the miss rate for proximal adenomas (CADe vs conventional: 20.0% vs 14.0%, P = .07) and polyps (26.7% vs 19.6%, P = .06). The CADe group, however, had significantly higher proximal polyp (58.0% vs 46.7%, P = .03) and adenoma (44.7% vs 34.6%, P = .04) detection rates than the conventional group. The mean number of proximal polyps and adenomas detected per patient during the first examination was also significantly higher in the CADe group (polyp: 1.20 vs .86, P = .03; adenoma, .91 vs .61, P = .03). Subgroup analysis showed that CADe enhanced proximal adenoma detection in patients with fair bowel preparation, shorter withdrawal time, and endoscopists with lower adenoma detection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial from Asia confirmed that CADe can further enhance proximal adenoma and polyp detection but may not be able to reduce the number of missed proximal colonic lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04294355.).

摘要

背景与目的

计算机辅助检测(CADe)是一项很有前景的技术进步,可提高结肠镜检查期间腺瘤的检出率。然而,CADe在减少结肠病变漏诊方面的作用尚不确定。本研究的目的是确定CADe和传统结肠镜检查对近端结肠病变的漏诊率。

方法

这是一项在3个亚洲中心进行的前瞻性、多中心、随机、串联结肠镜检查研究。患者被随机分配在首次退镜检查近端结肠(盲肠至脾曲)时接受CADe或传统白光结肠镜检查,随后两组均立即用白光对近端结肠进行串联检查。主要结局是腺瘤/息肉漏诊率,定义为在第二次检查中发现的任何腺瘤/息肉。

结果

在纳入的223例患者(男性占48.6%;中位年龄63岁)中,7例未进行串联检查,每组各留108例患者。近端腺瘤的漏诊率(CADe组与传统组:20.0%对14.0%,P = 0.07)和息肉漏诊率(26.7%对19.6%,P = 0.06)无差异。然而,CADe组近端息肉(58.0%对46.7%,P = 0.03)和腺瘤(44.7%对34.6%,P = 0.04)的检出率显著高于传统组。CADe组在首次检查期间每位患者检测到的近端息肉和腺瘤的平均数量也显著更高(息肉:1.20对0.86,P = 0.03;腺瘤,0.91对0.61,P = 0.03)。亚组分析显示,CADe可提高肠道准备良好、退镜时间较短以及腺瘤检出率较低的内镜医师对近端腺瘤的检出率。

结论

这项来自亚洲的多中心试验证实,CADe可进一步提高近端腺瘤和息肉的检出率,但可能无法减少近端结肠病变的漏诊数量。(临床试验注册号:NCT04294355。)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验