Suppr超能文献

用于内侧半月板后根部撕裂经胫骨拉出修复的缝合材料的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear.

作者信息

Hiranaka Takaaki, Furumatsu Takayuki, Okazaki Yuki, Kintaka Keisuke, Kamatsuki Yusuke, Zhang Ximing, Xue Haowei, Hamada Masanori, Ozaki Toshifumi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ako Central Hospital, 52-6 Soumoncho, Ako, Hyogo, 678-0241, Japan.

出版信息

Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Oct 8;34(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no recommendations for specific suture materials in transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 36 patients (27 women and 9 men, mean age 64.1 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears between November 2018 and December 2019. Two groups of 18 patients each received either two different cord-like sutures or suture tape. Clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months). The meniscal healing status was assessed using a previously published scoring system (ranging from 0 to 10), and the incidence rate of suture cut-out was assessed on second-look arthroscopy.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups, with no significant between-group differences on second-look arthroscopy. The arthroscopic meniscal healing scores significantly differed between sutures (mean 6.7 points) and suture tape (mean 7.4 points; p = 0.044). No significant between-group difference in the suture cut-out rate was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. Favorable clinical outcomes were obtained using both types of suture; however, the usefulness of suture tape appears to be limited.

摘要

背景

在胫骨内侧半月板后根撕裂的经胫骨拉出修复中,对于特定的缝合材料尚无推荐意见。本研究旨在评估使用超高分子量聚乙烯缝线和缝线带进行胫骨内侧半月板后根撕裂经胫骨拉出修复的临床效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2018年11月至2019年12月期间接受胫骨内侧半月板后根撕裂经胫骨拉出修复的36例患者(27例女性和9例男性,平均年龄64.1岁)的数据。两组各18例患者分别接受两种不同的绳状缝线或缝线带。术前及二次关节镜检查(平均术后12个月)时评估临床参数。使用先前发表的评分系统(范围为0至10分)评估半月板愈合状态,并在二次关节镜检查时评估缝线穿出的发生率。

结果

两组所有临床评分均显著改善,二次关节镜检查时组间无显著差异。缝线(平均6.7分)和缝线带(平均7.4分;p = 0.044)的关节镜半月板愈合评分存在显著差异。未观察到组间缝线穿出率的显著差异。

结论

本研究发现超高分子量聚乙烯缝线和缝线带在临床效果上无显著差异。两种缝线均获得了良好的临床效果;然而,缝线带的实用性似乎有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232f/9548199/a1f08b30bc0e/43019_2022_167_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验