Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
J Knee Surg. 2023 Sep;36(11):1200-1208. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750047. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Recently, transtibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (PRT) has become widely accepted and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes. Widening after cyclic loading or ultimate failure load using different suture materials and configurations has been studied. However, no study has compared the clinical outcomes using different suture materials. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after performing MMPRT pullout repair using different suture materials. We hypothesized that better clinical outcomes would be achieved using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tape compared with a normal polyester suture. Thirty-seven patients who underwent MM posterior root repair between November 2019 and May 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Pullout repair was performed using a hollow no. 0 polyester suture ( = 14) and UHMWPE tape ( = 23). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively, using the Lysholm knee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. The meniscal healing status was assessed using an arthroscopic scoring system (range: 0-10). All clinical scores were improved significantly in both groups. However, significantly higher meniscal healing scores and decreased VAS pain scores were observed in the UHMWPE group (7.3 ± 0.9 and 7.7 ± 11.3, respectively) than in the polyester group (5.6 ± 2.1 and 18.4 ± 18.6, respectively; < 0.01). Suture cut-out and loss of the root continuity were observed in some cases (three cases [21.4%] in the polyester suture group and one case [4.3%] in the UHMWPE tape group). Both suture materials led to satisfactory clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively, whereas the UHMWPE tape was useful for obtaining good meniscal healing and decreasing the VAS pain score.
最近,经胫骨内侧半月板(MM)后根部撕裂(PRT)的抽出修复已被广泛接受,并提供了满意的临床结果。已经研究了不同缝线材料和结构在循环加载后的宽度增加或最终失效负载。然而,没有研究比较使用不同缝线材料的临床结果。本研究旨在评估使用不同缝线材料进行 MMPRT 抽出修复后的临床结果。我们假设使用超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)带比普通聚酯缝线获得更好的临床结果。回顾性调查了 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受 MM 后根部修复的 37 例患者。使用空心 0 号聚酯缝线( = 14)和 UHMWPE 带( = 23)进行抽出修复。使用 Lysholm 膝关节评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分在术前和术后 1 年评估临床结果。使用关节镜评分系统评估半月板愈合状态(范围:0-10)。两组的所有临床评分均显著改善。然而,在 UHMWPE 组观察到更高的半月板愈合评分和降低的 VAS 疼痛评分(分别为 7.3 ± 0.9 和 7.7 ± 11.3),明显高于聚酯组(分别为 5.6 ± 2.1 和 18.4 ± 18.6; < 0.01)。在一些病例中观察到缝线切出和根部连续性丧失(聚酯缝线组 3 例[21.4%],UHMWPE 带组 1 例[4.3%])。两种缝线材料在术后 1 年均导致满意的临床结果,而 UHMWPE 带有助于获得良好的半月板愈合并降低 VAS 疼痛评分。