• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视句法、动作与左脑BA44区之间的关系。

Revisiting the relation between syntax, action, and left BA44.

作者信息

Kemmerer David

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IND, United States.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IND, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:923022. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.923022. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2022.923022
PMID:36211129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9537576/
Abstract

Among the many lines of research that have been exploring how embodiment contributes to cognition, one focuses on how the neural substrates of language may be shared, or at least closely coupled, with those of action. This paper revisits a particular proposal that has received considerable attention-namely, that the forms of hierarchical sequencing that characterize both linguistic syntax and goal-directed action are underpinned partly by common mechanisms in left Brodmann area (BA) 44, a cortical region that is not only classically regarded as part of Broca's area, but is also a core component of the human Mirror Neuron System. First, a recent multi-participant, multi-round debate about this proposal is summarized together with some other relevant findings. This review reveals that while the proposal is supported by a variety of theoretical arguments and empirical results, it still faces several challenges. Next, a narrower application of the proposal is discussed, specifically involving the basic word order of subject (S), object (O), and verb (V) in simple transitive clauses. Most languages are either SOV or SVO, and, building on prior work, it is argued that these strong syntactic tendencies derive from how left BA44 represents the sequential-hierarchical structure of goal-directed actions. Finally, with the aim of clarifying what it might mean for syntax and action to have "common" neural mechanisms in left BA44, two different versions of the main proposal are distinguished. Hypothesis 1 states that the very same neural mechanisms in left BA44 subserve some aspects of hierarchical sequencing for syntax and action, whereas Hypothesis 2 states that anatomically distinct but functionally parallel neural mechanisms in left BA44 subserve some aspects of hierarchical sequencing for syntax and action. Although these two hypotheses make different predictions, at this point neither one has significantly more explanatory power than the other, and further research is needed to elaborate and test them.

摘要

在众多探索具身性如何促进认知的研究方向中,有一个方向聚焦于语言的神经基础如何与动作的神经基础共享,或者至少紧密耦合。本文重新审视了一个备受关注的特定提议,即表征语言句法和目标导向动作的层次序列形式部分由左侧布罗德曼区(BA)44的共同机制支撑,该皮质区域不仅传统上被视为布洛卡区的一部分,也是人类镜像神经元系统的核心组成部分。首先,总结了最近关于该提议的多参与者、多轮辩论以及其他一些相关发现。这一综述表明,虽然该提议得到了各种理论论证和实证结果的支持,但它仍然面临一些挑战。接下来,讨论了该提议的一个更狭义的应用,具体涉及简单及物从句中主语(S)、宾语(O)和动词(V)的基本词序。大多数语言要么是主宾谓(SOV)型,要么是主谓宾(SVO)型,基于先前的研究,有人认为这些强烈的句法倾向源于左侧BA44对目标导向动作的序列层次结构的表征方式。最后,为了阐明在左侧BA44中句法和动作拥有“共同”神经机制可能意味着什么,区分了主要提议的两个不同版本。假设1指出,左侧BA44中完全相同的神经机制服务于句法和动作的层次序列的某些方面,而假设2指出,左侧BA44中在解剖学上不同但功能平行的神经机制服务于句法和动作的层次序列的某些方面。尽管这两个假设做出了不同的预测,但目前两者都没有比对方具有显著更强的解释力,需要进一步的研究来详细阐述和检验它们。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5df/9537576/e5268853bd2b/fnhum-16-923022-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5df/9537576/e5268853bd2b/fnhum-16-923022-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5df/9537576/e5268853bd2b/fnhum-16-923022-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisiting the relation between syntax, action, and left BA44.重新审视句法、动作与左脑BA44区之间的关系。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:923022. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.923022. eCollection 2022.
2
Uncovering the Morphological Evolution of Language-Relevant Brain Areas.揭示与语言相关脑区的形态演变
bioRxiv. 2023 Mar 17:2023.03.17.533103. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.17.533103.
3
Morphological evolution of language-relevant brain areas.语言相关脑区的形态演变。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Sep 1;21(9):e3002266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002266. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Language and action in Broca's area: Computational differentiation and cortical segregation.布洛卡区的语言与动作:计算分化与皮质分离
Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105651. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area.句法的神经学:无布洛卡区的语言运用
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):1-21; discussion 21-71. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002399.
6
The language skeleton after dissecting meaning: A functional segregation within Broca's Area.解剖意义后的语言骨架:布罗卡区的功能分离。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
7
Online neurostimulation of Broca's area does not interfere with syntactic predictions: A combined TMS-EEG approach to basic linguistic combination.对布洛卡区的在线神经刺激不会干扰句法预测:一种结合经颅磁刺激-脑电图的基本语言组合研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:968836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968836. eCollection 2022.
8
Universal neural basis of structure building evidenced by network modulations emerging from Broca's area: The case of Chinese.普遍的结构构建的神经基础由布罗卡区的网络调节显现:以中文为例。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Apr 15;40(6):1705-1717. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24482. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
9
Hierarchical processing in the prefrontal cortex in a variety of cognitive domains.前额叶皮层在多种认知领域中的层级加工。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Nov 25;8:223. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00223. eCollection 2014.
10
Children's syntax is supported by the maturation of BA44 at 4 years, but of the posterior STS at 3 years of age.儿童的句法由 4 岁时 BA44 的成熟支持,但由 3 岁时的后 STS 支持。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 25;33(9):5426-5435. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac430.

引用本文的文献

1
Discordant Wada and fMRI language lateralization: a case report.Wada 试验与 fMRI 语言侧化结果不一致:1 例报告。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Sep;52(9):3000605241265338. doi: 10.1177/03000605241265338.
2
A reconceptualization of sentence production in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia: the synergistic processing bottleneck model.中风后语法缺失性失语中句子生成的重新概念化:协同加工瓶颈模型
Front Lang Sci. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/flang.2023.1118739. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Distinct neural mechanisms for action access and execution in the human brain: insights from an fMRI study.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving beyond domain-specific versus domain-general options in cognitive neuroscience.超越认知神经科学中的领域特定与领域一般选项。
Cortex. 2022 Sep;154:259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.句法的进化起源:非人类灵长类动物的事件认知。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabn8464. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8464. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Geometry of sequence working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex.灵长类动物前额叶皮层中序列工作记忆的几何结构。
人类大脑中动作获取和执行的不同神经机制:来自 fMRI 研究的见解。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Apr 1;34(4). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae163.
4
The uniqueness of the human brain: a review.人类大脑的独特性:综述
Dement Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr 15;18:e20230078. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0078. eCollection 2024.
5
Neural basis of sound-symbolic pseudoword-shape correspondences.声音-符号伪词形状对应关系的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Sep 9;188:108657. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108657. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Neural Basis Of Sound-Symbolic Pseudoword-Shape Correspondences.语音-符号假词形状对应关系的神经基础。
bioRxiv. 2023 Jun 26:2023.04.14.536865. doi: 10.1101/2023.04.14.536865.
Science. 2022 Feb 11;375(6581):632-639. doi: 10.1126/science.abm0204. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Tool use and language share syntactic processes and neural patterns in the basal ganglia.工具使用和语言在基底神经节中共享句法过程和神经模式。
Science. 2021 Nov 12;374(6569):eabe0874. doi: 10.1126/science.abe0874.
5
What modulates the Mirror Neuron System during action observation?: Multiple factors involving the action, the actor, the observer, the relationship between actor and observer, and the context.是什么调节了动作观察过程中的镜像神经元系统?涉及动作、行为者、观察者、行为者和观察者之间的关系以及情境等多种因素。
Prog Neurobiol. 2021 Oct;205:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102128. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
6
A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.大脑特化的连接组假说
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Mar 31;31(5):2425-2449. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa365.
7
A Sound Explanation for Motor Cortex Engagement during Action Word Comprehension.动作词理解过程中运动皮层参与的合理解释。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jan;33(1):129-145. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01640. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
Is Language Production Planning Emergent From Action Planning? A Preliminary Investigation.语言产出规划是否源自行动规划?一项初步调查。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01193. eCollection 2020.
9
Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.低级还是高级运动编码?刺激复杂性的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 11;13:332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00332. eCollection 2019.
10
The topographical organization of motor processing: An ALE meta-analysis on six action domains and the relevance of Broca's region.运动加工的拓扑组织:基于六个动作领域的 ALE 荟萃分析及 Broca 区的相关性
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116321. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116321. Epub 2019 Oct 31.