Foinant Damien, Lafraire Jérémie, Thibaut Jean-Pierre
LEAD - CNRS UMR-5022, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Institut Paul Bocuse Research Center, Écully, France.
Front Nutr. 2022 Sep 21;9:951890. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.951890. eCollection 2022.
Preschoolers' neophobic dispositions mainly target fruits and vegetables. They received a great deal of attention in the past decades as these dispositions represent the main psychological barrier to dietary variety. Recently, children's food neophobia has been found to be negatively correlated with their categorization performance (i.e., the accuracy to discriminate between food categories). We investigated categorization strategies among neophobic children, tendencies to favor one type of error over the other (misses over false alarms), in order to compensate for their poor categorization performance. To capture children's categorization strategies, we used the Signal Detection Theory framework. A first experiment assessed 120 3-to-6-years old children' sensitivity to discriminate between foods and nonfoods as well as their decision criterion (i.e., response strategy). In a second experiment, we manipulated the influence of food processing. The hypothesis was that food processing acts as a sign of human interventions that decreases uncertainty about edibility and thus promotes feelings of safety in the food domain. 137 children were tested on a food versus nonfood categorization task contrasting whole and sliced stimuli. In both experiments, increased levels of food neophobia were significantly associated with poorer categorization sensitivity and with a more conservative decision criterion (i.e., favoring "it is inedible" errors). Additionally, results from Experiment 2 revealed that food processing did not influence neophobic children, whereas their neophilic counterparts adopted a more liberal decision criterion for sliced stimuli than for whole stimuli. These findings are the first demonstration of a relationship between a decision criterion and food neophobia in young children. These results have strong implications for theories of food neophobia and laid the groundwork for designing novel types of food education interventions.
学龄前儿童的新食物恐惧症主要针对水果和蔬菜。在过去几十年里,这些倾向受到了大量关注,因为它们是饮食多样化的主要心理障碍。最近,人们发现儿童的食物新恐惧症与他们的分类表现(即区分食物类别的准确性)呈负相关。我们研究了有新食物恐惧症的儿童的分类策略,以及他们更倾向于哪种错误类型(漏报而非误报),以弥补他们较差的分类表现。为了捕捉儿童的分类策略,我们使用了信号检测理论框架。第一个实验评估了120名3至6岁儿童区分食物和非食物的敏感度以及他们的决策标准(即反应策略)。在第二个实验中,我们操纵了食物加工的影响。假设是食物加工是人类干预的一种标志,它降低了可食用性的不确定性,从而增强了在食物领域的安全感。137名儿童在一项对比完整和切片刺激物的食物与非食物分类任务中接受了测试。在两个实验中,食物新恐惧症程度的增加都与较差的分类敏感度以及更保守的决策标准(即倾向于“不可食用”错误)显著相关。此外,实验2的结果表明,食物加工对有新食物恐惧症的儿童没有影响,而他们有新食物偏好的同龄人对切片刺激物采用了比完整刺激物更宽松的决策标准。这些发现首次证明了幼儿的决策标准与食物新恐惧症之间的关系。这些结果对食物新恐惧症理论有重要意义,并为设计新型食物教育干预措施奠定了基础。