Chandok Raj S, Madar Poonam, Majeed Azeem
Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of International Politics, City, University of London, London, UK.
JRSM Open. 2022 Oct 4;13(10):20542704221123430. doi: 10.1177/20542704221123430. eCollection 2022 Oct.
This qualitative study sought to elicit the views and experiences of patients and health-care professionals to identify the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among South Asians in London.
In-depth semi-structured telephone and virtual interviews.
UK.
Convenience and purposive sample of 12 individuals including patients, clinicians, and a medical receptionist.
Our dataset identifies and explains the reasons for distinguishing between those individuals who are and those who are
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the decision on whether to - or not to - vaccinate against COVID-19 involves ongoing and unresolved inner conflict about COVID-19 vaccines. Our findings therefore suggest that some individuals may be existing in a state of where they are neither pro nor anti vaccination, while simultaneously questioning the many 'truths' surrounding COVID-19 and not just one truth such as the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. We argue that this state is intensified by technology and social media; culminating in the whereby a combination of truths, fractured truths, subjective realities, and unreliable or contradictory sources impact on our perceptions of COVID-19.
Given the complexities arising from the multiple factors influencing vaccine hesitancy and scepticism, 'quick fixes' and 'one size fits all' solutions to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy will be ineffective. Therefore, promoting trust and prioritising good after-care as well as on-going care as a response to the effects of the pandemic is vital.
本定性研究旨在了解患者和医护人员的观点及经历,以确定伦敦南亚人群中与新冠疫苗犹豫相关的因素。
深入的半结构化电话访谈和虚拟访谈。
英国。
采用便利抽样和目的抽样,选取了12名个体,包括患者、临床医生和一名医疗接待员。
我们的数据集识别并解释了区分接种疫苗者和未接种疫苗者的原因。
新冠疫苗犹豫以及是否接种新冠疫苗的决定涉及对新冠疫苗持续存在且未解决的内心冲突。因此,我们的研究结果表明,一些人可能处于一种既不支持也不反对接种疫苗的状态,同时质疑围绕新冠病毒的诸多“真相”,而不仅仅是一个真相,比如新冠疫苗的安全性。我们认为,这种状态因技术和社交媒体而加剧;最终导致一种局面,即各种真相、碎片化的真相、主观现实以及不可靠或相互矛盾的信息来源影响了我们对新冠病毒的认知。
鉴于影响疫苗犹豫和怀疑态度的多种因素所产生的复杂性,解决新冠疫苗犹豫问题的“快速解决方案”和“一刀切”方法将是无效的。因此,促进信任并将良好的后续护理以及持续护理作为应对疫情影响的重点至关重要。