Mehta Shivam Y, Han Michael D, Tsay T Peter, Kusnoto Budi
Division of Orthodontics, UNiversity of Connnecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL, USA.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):242-248. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_913_20. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Improved esthetics is an important factor for most patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Thus, a treatment simulation that can provide patients with a realistic view of the esthetic outcome after surgery is important in clinical practice.
To evaluate the accuracy of simulations generated using algorithms specific for patient's type of malocclusion and surgical procedure compared to nonspecific algorithms.
A total of 36 patients (average age 18.41 years) who had undergone maxillary advancement and mandibular setback for Class III malocclusion were included.
The presurgical and postsurgical cone-beam computed tomography scans were used to generate the lateral cephalograms and the surgical simulations were created with the patient-specific algorithm (specific for Class III patients) and the nonspecific algorithm (default algorithm not specific for any particular malocclusion or type of surgery) using the treatment simulation feature in Dolphin Imaging software. The accuracy of the simulations was examined by comparing the soft-tissue changes in the surgical simulations with the postsurgical result.
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS-software at 0.05 significance level. For the mean difference between the postsurgical and surgical-simulation landmarks, a paired sample -test (Student's -test) was performed.
Patient-specific algorithms were accurate in vertical prediction of lower lip, B', tip of nose, upper lip, and horizontal prediction of pogonion'. Whereas the nonspecific algorithm was accurate in the horizontal prediction of the lower lip, pogonion', and menton'.
Patient-specific and nonspecific algorithms for generating surgical simulations showed different accuracy for vertical and horizontal predictions of the parameters.
对于大多数接受正颌手术的患者而言,改善美观是一个重要因素。因此,在临床实践中,能够为患者提供术后美观效果真实视图的治疗模拟非常重要。
与非特定算法相比,评估使用针对患者错牙合类型和手术程序的特定算法生成的模拟的准确性。
共纳入36例接受上颌前突和下颌后退治疗III类错牙合的患者(平均年龄18.41岁)。
术前和术后的锥形束计算机断层扫描用于生成头颅侧位片,并使用Dolphin Imaging软件中的治疗模拟功能,通过患者特定算法(针对III类患者)和非特定算法(不针对任何特定错牙合或手术类型的默认算法)创建手术模拟。通过比较手术模拟中的软组织变化与术后结果来检查模拟的准确性。
使用SPSS软件在0.05显著性水平下进行统计分析。对于术后和手术模拟标志点之间的平均差异,进行配对样本t检验(学生t检验)。
患者特定算法在垂直预测下唇、B'、鼻尖、上唇以及水平预测颏前点方面准确。而非特定算法在水平预测下唇、颏前点和颏下点方面准确。
用于生成手术模拟的患者特定算法和非特定算法在参数的垂直和水平预测方面显示出不同的准确性。