School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Dent Res. 2023 Jan;102(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/00220345221119431. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
It is important to both protect the healthy development and maintain the oral health of the child population. The study examined the effect of early childhood exposures to water fluoridation on measures of school-age executive functioning and emotional and behavioral development in a population-based sample. This longitudinal follow-up study used information from Australia's National Child Oral Health Study 2012-14. Children aged 5 to 10 y at baseline were contacted again after 7 to 8 y, before they had turned 18 y of age. Percent lifetime exposed to fluoridated water (%LEFW) from birth to the age 5 y was estimated from residential history and postcode-level fluoride levels in public tap water. Measures of children's emotional and behavioral development were assessed by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and executive functioning was measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Multivariable regression models were generated to compare the associations between the exposure and the primary outcomes and controlled for covariates. An equivalence test was also conducted to compare the primary outcomes of those who had 100% LEFW against those with 0% LEFW. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted. A total of 2,682 children completed the SDQ and BRIEF, with mean scores of 7.0 (95% confidence interval, 6.6-7.4) and 45.3 (44.7-45.8), respectively. Those with lower %LEFW tended to have poorer scores of the SDQ and BRIEF. Multivariable regression models reported no association between exposure to fluoridated water and the SDQ and BRIEF scores. Low household income, identifying as Indigenous, and having a neurodevelopmental diagnosis were associated with poorer SDQ/BRIEF scores. An equivalence test confirmed that the SDQ/BRIEF scores among those with 100% LEFW were equivalent to that of those who had 0% LEFW. Exposure to fluoridated water during the first 5 y of life was not associated with altered measures of child emotional and behavioral development and executive functioning.
保护儿童人口的健康发展和口腔健康都很重要。本研究在基于人群的样本中,考察了儿童早期接触水氟化对学龄期执行功能以及情绪和行为发展的衡量指标的影响。这项纵向随访研究使用了澳大利亚 2012-14 年全国儿童口腔健康研究的数据。在基线时年龄为 5 至 10 岁的儿童,在他们未满 18 岁之前,在 7 至 8 年后再次被联系。从出生到 5 岁时一生中暴露于氟化水的百分比(%LEFW),是根据居住史和公共自来水中的氟化物水平估算的。儿童情绪和行为发展的衡量指标是通过《强项和困难问卷》(SDQ)评估的,执行功能则通过《行为评定量表》(BRIEF)来衡量。生成多变量回归模型来比较暴露与主要结果之间的关联,并控制了协变量。还进行了等效性检验,以比较暴露于 100%LEFW 和 0%LEFW 的儿童的主要结果。还进行了敏感性分析。共有 2682 名儿童完成了 SDQ 和 BRIEF,得分分别为 7.0(95%置信区间,6.6-7.4)和 45.3(44.7-45.8)。%LEFW 较低的儿童往往在 SDQ 和 BRIEF 得分上表现较差。多变量回归模型报告了暴露于氟化水中与 SDQ 和 BRIEF 得分之间没有关联。家庭收入较低、被认定为土著以及有神经发育诊断与 SDQ/BRIEF 得分较低有关。等效性检验证实,暴露于 100%LEFW 的儿童的 SDQ/BRIEF 得分与暴露于 0%LEFW 的儿童的得分相当。在生命的前 5 年接触氟化水与儿童情绪和行为发展以及执行功能的改变衡量指标无关。