Suppr超能文献

腹直肌鞘平面阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜子宫切除术中的比较。

Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University, 46202, Indiana.

Medical Student, Indiana University School of Medicine, 46202, Indiana.

出版信息

Pain Manag. 2022 Nov;12(8):907-916. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2022-0037. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

Abstract

The objective was to determine whether an erector spinae plane (ESP) block could provide additional postoperative analgesic benefits compared with a transversus abdominis plane block. 78 patients were separated into two groups (n = 39 per group). Both groups received bilateral injections of 266 mg Exparel (20 ml) and 60 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. Patients undergoing a transversus abdominis plane block received these injections intraoperatively, while patients undergoing an ESP block received these preoperatively. Outcomes were measured based on scores in opioid usage; pain (visual analog scale) at rest and with movement; nausea; sedation and patient satisfaction. There were no significant intergroup differences in any category (all scores had p > 0.05). No additional analgesic benefits were found using the ESP block procedure.

摘要

目的是确定竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是否比腹横肌平面阻滞提供额外的术后镇痛益处。78 名患者分为两组(每组 n = 39)。两组均接受双侧注射 266mg Exparel(20ml)和 0.125%布比卡因 60ml。接受腹横肌平面阻滞的患者在术中接受这些注射,而接受 ESP 阻滞的患者则在术前接受这些注射。根据阿片类药物使用评分、静息和运动时的疼痛(视觉模拟评分)、恶心、镇静和患者满意度来衡量结果。在任何类别中,两组之间均无显著差异(所有评分的 p 值均大于 0.05)。ESP 阻滞程序未发现额外的镇痛益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验