Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University, 46202, Indiana.
Medical Student, Indiana University School of Medicine, 46202, Indiana.
Pain Manag. 2022 Nov;12(8):907-916. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2022-0037. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
The objective was to determine whether an erector spinae plane (ESP) block could provide additional postoperative analgesic benefits compared with a transversus abdominis plane block. 78 patients were separated into two groups (n = 39 per group). Both groups received bilateral injections of 266 mg Exparel (20 ml) and 60 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. Patients undergoing a transversus abdominis plane block received these injections intraoperatively, while patients undergoing an ESP block received these preoperatively. Outcomes were measured based on scores in opioid usage; pain (visual analog scale) at rest and with movement; nausea; sedation and patient satisfaction. There were no significant intergroup differences in any category (all scores had p > 0.05). No additional analgesic benefits were found using the ESP block procedure.
目的是确定竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是否比腹横肌平面阻滞提供额外的术后镇痛益处。78 名患者分为两组(每组 n = 39)。两组均接受双侧注射 266mg Exparel(20ml)和 0.125%布比卡因 60ml。接受腹横肌平面阻滞的患者在术中接受这些注射,而接受 ESP 阻滞的患者则在术前接受这些注射。根据阿片类药物使用评分、静息和运动时的疼痛(视觉模拟评分)、恶心、镇静和患者满意度来衡量结果。在任何类别中,两组之间均无显著差异(所有评分的 p 值均大于 0.05)。ESP 阻滞程序未发现额外的镇痛益处。